当前位置： SCI文献检索 > Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science期刊下所有文献 > New Drug and Biologics Approvals in 2019: A Systematic Analysis of Patient Experience Data in FDA Drug Approval Packages and Product Labels.

New Drug and Biologics Approvals in 2019: A Systematic Analysis of Patient Experience Data in FDA Drug Approval Packages and Product Labels.

Abstract：

BACKGROUND:The FDA Patient-Focused Drug Development Initiative was launched to ensure the incorporation of the patient voice into drug development and evaluation. Since 2017, the FDA must publish a statement outlining patient experience data (PED) considered in the approval of new drugs. This study investigated the presence and role of PED in drug approval and translation into product label claims. METHODS:PED reported in approval packages of the 48 drugs approved by FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research in 2019 was identified and categorized. PED in the form of clinical outcome assessments (COAs) was characterized by endpoint positioning and outcome. The product labels were analyzed for PED-related claims. RESULTS:PED was reported as relevant for 39 of 48 (81.3%) drugs approved in 2019. COAs were the predominant PED type; other PED was identified for only 9 (18.8%) drugs, and none included qualitative or patient preference studies. COAs were the only type of PED for which associated claims were identified in the product labels. 27 out of 48 (56.3%) labels contained one or more efficacy claims based on COAs; of these, patient-reported outcomes were the most prevalent with claims identified in 19 labels (39.6%). CONCLUSION:There are ample opportunities for incorporating PED beyond COAs to inform drug development and facilitate availability of medicines tailored to patient needs. A higher level of transparency on the role of PED in regulatory decision-making and a clear path to PED-based label claims could incentivize sponsors and enable patient empowerment in treatment decisions.

journal_name

Ther Innov Regul Sci

journal_title

Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors

Schultz-Knudsen K,Sabaliauskaite U,Hellsten J,Lassen AB,Morant AV

doi

10.1007/s43441-020-00244-x

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2020-11-23 00:00:00

eissn

2168-4790

issn

2168-4804

pii

10.1007/s43441-020-00244-x

pub_type

杂志文章

相关文献

Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science文献大全
  • Factors that have an Impact on Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) Submissions.

    abstract：BACKGROUND:Increasing generic drug price competition by facilitating abbreviated new drug applications (ANDA) submission may help patients have access to affordable care. This study examined factors associated with first ANDA submission for the brand drug to be copied [the "reference listed drug" (RLD)]. METHODS:This ...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1007/s43441-020-00163-x

    authors： Wittayanukorn S,Rosenberg M,Schick A,Hu M,Wang Z,Babiskin A,Lionberger R,Zhao L

    更新日期：2020-11-01 00:00:00

  • Baseline Assessment of the Evolving 2017 eClinical Landscape.

    abstract：:The volume and diversity of data collected to support each clinical study has increased dramatically in response to the rising scope and complexity of global drug development programs. The Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development conducted an online survey of 257 unique global companies-77% drug development spon...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479018769292

    authors： Wilkinson M,Young R,Harper B,Machion B,Getz K

    更新日期：2019-01-01 00:00:00

  • Statistical Considerations on Clinical Efficacy Studies of Biosimilar for PMDA Submission.

    abstract：:In general, similar to FDA and other health authorities, the PMDA requires clinical efficacy study(ies) to evaluate equivalence between a reference biological product and a Biosimilar product for new drug applications. Even if an identical clinical efficacy study is included in both of PMDA and FDA submissions, the co...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1007/s43441-020-00133-3

    authors： Asami Y,Pan J,Oh M,Sato A

    更新日期：2020-09-01 00:00:00

  • Regulatory Perspective of International Agencies for Development of Biosimilar Products (Monoclonal Antibodies): An Overview.

    abstract：:Biopharmaceutical medicines are complex molecules obtained from a living organism (plant or animal cells) and may contain components of a living organism using biotechnology. Biosimilars are closely similar to already approved biopharmaceutical products that could form a new generation of medicines that are available ...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章,评审

    doi：10.1007/s43441-020-00112-8

    authors： Sharma A,Khante S,Mahadik KR,Gaikwad VL

    更新日期：2020-09-01 00:00:00

  • An Assessment of Concerns Regarding New Regulatory Guidance for Combination Products: A Review of the Submissions Made to the FDA Regarding Their Proposed Draft New Guidance on Human Factors Studies for a Combination Product in an Abbreviated New Drug App

    abstract：BACKGROUND:The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) put out a call for comments on new draft guidance for industry "Comparative Analyses and Related Comparative Use Human Factors Studies for a Drug-Device Combination Product Submitted in an ANDA." This call for comments elicited 7 submissions from various organization...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章,评审

    doi：10.1177/2168479018775659

    authors： Lance PT,Greenaway RV,Edwards B

    更新日期：2019-03-01 00:00:00

  • Communicating Immunogenicity-Associated Risk in Current U.S. FDA Prescription Drug Labeling: A Systematic Evaluation.

    abstract：BACKGROUND:Communicating the clinical impact of immunogenicity in labeling is important for safe and effective use of certain prescription products. Current U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance does not provide comprehensive recommendations on the communication of clinical impact of immunogenicity in labeli...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1007/s43441-020-00161-z

    authors： Guinn D,Madabushi R,Wang YM,Brodsky E,Zineh I,Maxfield K

    更新日期：2020-11-01 00:00:00

  • Mobile Nurse Services in Clinical Trials: Usage and Industry Perceptions.

    abstract：BACKGROUND:With the pharmaceutical industry's increased attention on enhancing patient experiences during their participation in clinical trials, the use of mobile nurse (MN) services to support the conduct of clinical trial assessments in the home (or in alternative locations other than in investigational sites) has b...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479015625712

    authors： Stergiopoulos S,Eustace C,Stem K,Getz KA

    更新日期：2016-07-01 00:00:00

  • Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies With Elements to Assure Safe Use: Alignment of the Goals With the Tools to Manage Risk.

    abstract：:The Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 gave the FDA the authority to require drug sponsors to submit a risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS) program for those medicines with serious risks such that failure to effectively manage these risks would tip the benefit-risk balance. As of August 8,...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479014527749

    authors： Cronin M,Berger S,Seligman PJ

    更新日期：2014-11-01 00:00:00

  • A Framework for Managing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Clinical Trials.

    abstract：:There is a long history of discussions about what is a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and how this term applies to clinical research. This paper deals with a practical framework for MCID and its applicability to clinical trials. A literature review on the topic confirmed the fundamental role of MCID fo...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479013487541

    authors： Koynova D,Lühmann R,Fischer R

    更新日期：2013-07-01 00:00:00

  • Patient Experience Data in US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Regulatory Decision Making:: A Policy Process Perspective.

    abstract：BACKGROUND:The influence of patient advocates on FDA regulatory decision making has increased. Despite enhanced engagement with FDA, there remain challenges to achieving the regulatory goals of patients within FDA's regulatory framework. Gaps exist between patient advocates' knowledge of the agency's processes and FDA'...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479017753390

    authors： Kuehn CM

    更新日期：2018-09-01 00:00:00

  • Regulatory Definitions and Good Pharmacovigilance Practices in Social Media: Challenges and Recommendations.

    abstract：:Social media presents new challenges to the biopharmaceutical industry for conducting pharmacovigilance activities. The authors reviewed worldwide regulatory guidance documents related to monitoring of adverse events posted on social media sites and identified gaps in current regulatory definitions for pharmacovigilan...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479015587362

    authors： Naik P,Umrath T,van Stekelenborg J,Ruben R,Abdul-Karim N,Boland R,Ibara M,Ekuta J,Washburn D,Stergiopoulos S

    更新日期：2015-11-01 00:00:00

  • Building a Better Approach for the Benefit of Patients: 10 Pillars to Strengthen Regulatory Review Systems Globally.

    abstract：:In the current pharmaceutical regulatory environment, patients continue to benefit from great advances in medical care. Sophisticated regulatory review systems have also evolved to ensure that safe and effective medicines are approved. However, these systems are not optimized in all countries. Gaps in individual regul...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1007/s43441-019-00055-9

    authors： O'Brien J,Lumsden RS,Diehl DH,Macdonald JC

    更新日期：2020-03-01 00:00:00

  • Interdisciplinary Safety Evaluation and Quantitative Safety Monitoring: Introduction to a Series of Papers.

    abstract：:The American Statistical Association and DIA have created an interdisciplinary working group of drug safety experts from academia, industry and regulatory backgrounds to explore the future direction for safety monitoring. This introduction to the series explains the background and rationale for this special section. ...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479018793130

    authors： Seltzer JH,Li J,Wang W

    更新日期：2019-03-29 00:00:00

  • Lessons Learned From Hundreds of Thorough QT Studies.

    abstract：BACKGROUND:The coherence between the relationship of QTc and drug plasma concentration (this relationship is measured through the slope) and ICH E14 findings based on hundreds of QT study reports was studied. RESULTS:Based on ICH E14 analysis, our findings indicate that if the slope was not positive, in most cases (86...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479014563549

    authors： Zhang J,Chen H,Tsong Y,Stockbridge N

    更新日期：2015-05-01 00:00:00

  • Expediting Drug Development: FDA's New Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy Designation.

    abstract：:In March 2017, the US FDA introduced the new Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (RMAT) designation thus recognizing the enormous potential of these medicines and the need for efficient regulatory tools to accelerate their development and their commercial availability. The development of regenerative medicines is v...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479018779373

    authors： Vaggelas A,Seimetz D

    更新日期：2019-05-01 00:00:00

  • Single-Study Approvals: Quantum of Evidence Required.

    abstract：:When does a single positive adequate and well-controlled study of a new drug meet the statutory requirement to demonstrate substantial evidence of effectiveness? The answer to this question, particularly with respect to new molecular entities, has been of considerable debate since 1962 when the requirement that new dr...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1007/s43441-019-00103-4

    authors： Sasinowski FJ,Butler ML

    更新日期：2020-05-01 00:00:00

  • A Universal Framework for the Benefit-Risk Assessment of Medicines: Is This the Way Forward?

    abstract：:A universal framework for the evaluation of the benefit-risk assessment of medicines during development by pharmaceutical companies and in the regulatory review by regulatory authorities is considered of value, as it would result in the systematic structured approach to support transparency in decision making. Several...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479014547421

    authors： Walker S,McAuslane N,Liberti L,Leong J,Salek S

    更新日期：2015-01-01 00:00:00

  • Future Perspectives for the Treatment of Diabetes: Importance of a Regulatory Framework.

    abstract：BACKGROUND:The number of diabetes patients is steadily increasing worldwide. Consequently, the social burden of diabetes is huge, requiring urgent countermeasures. We performed an intensive survey of antidiabetic drugs approved in Japan, the United States, and the European Union. METHODS:Information about approved ant...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479018795854

    authors： Tsukamoto K,Cnop M,Mori D,Kume S,Anazawa T,Doi M,Chikazawa K,Matsumaru N

    更新日期：2019-07-01 00:00:00

  • Technology Considerations to Enable the Risk-Based Monitoring Methodology.

    abstract：:TransCelerate BioPharma Inc developed a methodology based on the notion that shifting monitoring processes from an excessive concentration on source data verification to comprehensive risk-driven monitoring will increase efficiencies and enhance patient safety and data integrity while maintaining adherence to good cli...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479014546336

    authors： Barnes S,Katta N,Sanford N,Staigers T,Verish T

    更新日期：2014-09-01 00:00:00

  • Implementation of the European QRD Template in Package Leaflets of Centralized Approved Medicines.

    abstract：BACKGROUND:Package leaflets of medicines distributed within the European Union should use the template headings and standard texts created by the Working Group on the Quality Review of Documents (QRD). The following study investigated how the QRD template is implemented in this patient information. METHODS:All English...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479015620247

    authors： Wolf A,Fuchs J,Schweim HG

    更新日期：2016-01-01 00:00:00

  • Smart Program Design Through a Common Information Model.

    abstract：:Although much information is already available publically from information-sharing initiatives such as ClinicalTrials.gov, information about clinical programs is unstructured, inconsistent, and incomplete. Clinical research within bioscience companies, health care, academia, and governmental agencies could benefit fro...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479014539158

    authors： Vasko L,Sundgren M,Bachmann P,Balinski K,Bleich N,Blom T,Eriksson H,Ferendo R,Forsberg K,King D,Mordiva A,Proeve J,Thomas L,Witch E,Simán M

    更新日期：2015-01-01 00:00:00

  • Impact of Premium Rewards for the Promotion of Innovative Drug Discovery on the Japanese Pharmaceutical Market: An Analysis by Therapeutic Area.

    abstract：BACKGROUND:A new incentive program, "Premium Rewards for the Promotion of Innovative Drug Discovery and Resolution of Off-Label Use, etc," was introduced in Japan in 2010 and subsequently applied in 2010, 2012, and 2014. In our previous study, we reported statistical evidence regarding the attributes of drugs for which...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479015600205

    authors： Shibata S,Uemura R,Suzuki T

    更新日期：2016-01-01 00:00:00

  • Insights and Best Practices for Planning and Implementing Patient Advisory Boards.

    abstract：:A growing number of organizations-including pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, foundations and associations-are routinely implementing patient advisory boards (PAB) given their high reported value for minimal relative investment. Organizations are typically implementing PABs to solicit patient voices and pers...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479017720475

    authors： Anderson A,Getz KA

    更新日期：2018-07-01 00:00:00

  • Over-the-Counter Drugs: Regulatory Analysis of Warning Letters Between Fiscal Years 2015-2019.

    abstract：BACKGROUND:According to 21 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part 211, Over-the-Counter (OTC) drug manufacturers must establish and follow current good manufacturing practices (cGMP) to produce quality products while meeting regulatory standards. The warning letters issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1007/s43441-020-00231-2

    authors： Bai HK,Ahearn JD,Bartlett MG

    更新日期：2020-10-23 00:00:00

  • Strategic Shift of Statistical Review on Data Quality Assessment for New Drug Applications in China.

    abstract：:Data quality is critical for clinical trials to obtain robust conclusions about drug safety and efficacy evaluation. Effective data quality evaluation has been one of the major obstacles to new drug approvals in China, which hinders innovation in drug discovery and development ultimately. To improve the data quality s...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479018778528

    authors： Wang J,Wang G,Li M,Han J,Zeng X,Pan J,Yang J

    更新日期：2019-03-01 00:00:00

  • Responsibilities of Data Monitoring Committees: Consensus Recommendations.

    abstract：BACKGROUND:A data monitoring committee (DMC) has special responsibilities for protecting the safety of clinical trial participants. Few guidance documents are available that address the operations and mechanics of establishing, serving on, or reporting to a DMC. This article provides a practical guide to sponsors, inst...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479016646812

    authors： Bierer BE,Li R,Seltzer J,Sleeper LA,Frank E,Knirsch C,Aldinger CE,Levine RJ,Massaro J,Shah A,Barnes M,Snapinn S,Wittes J

    更新日期：2016-09-01 00:00:00

  • Methods for Employing Information About Uncertainty of Ascertainment of Events in Clinical Trials.

    abstract：BACKGROUND:Uncertain ascertainment of events in clinical trials has been noted for decades. To correct possible bias, Clinical Endpoint Committees (CECs) have been employed as a critical element of trials to ensure consistent and high-quality endpoint evaluation, especially for cardiovascular endpoints. However, the ef...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1007/s43441-020-00206-3

    authors： Chen Y,Lawrence J,Hung HMJ,Stockbridge N

    更新日期：2021-01-01 00:00:00

  • Effective Partnering in Conducting Benefit-Risk Patient Preference Studies: Perspectives From a Patient Advocacy Organization, a Pharmaceutical Company, and Academic Stated-Preference Researchers.

    abstract：BACKGROUND:Formal incorporation of patients' perspectives is becoming increasingly important in medical product development and decision making. This article shares practical advice regarding how patient advocacy organizations, the pharmaceutical industry, and academic experts in stated-preference research can effectiv...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479017746404

    authors： Wolka AM,Fairchild AO,Reed SD,Anglin G,Johnson FR,Siegel M,Noel R

    更新日期：2018-07-01 00:00:00

  • A Data-Driven Approach to Risk-Based Source Data Verification.

    abstract：:Source data verification (SDV) is the process of confirming that reliable, accurate information collected from participants during a clinical trial has been reported successfully to the trial's sponsor by investigators conducting the study. Over the past 15 years or so, there has been considerable discussion in the li...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479013496245

    authors： Nielsen E,Hyder D,Deng C

    更新日期：2014-03-01 00:00:00

  • Expanded Access Programs: Ethical and Practical Considerations for Biopharmaceutical Sponsors.

    abstract：:Expanded access is a regulatory mechanism by which an investigational drug can be made available outside of a clinical trial to treat patients with serious or life-threatening conditions for which there are no satisfactory treatment options. An expanded access program (EAP) is the formal plan under which preapproval a...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479015578154

    authors： Klopfenstein M,Van Campen LE,Garnett T

    更新日期：2015-05-01 00:00:00