当前位置： SCI文献检索 > EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY期刊下所有文献 > Patient-reported experience measure in pancreatobiliary endoscopy: a systematic review to highlight areas for improvement.

Patient-reported experience measure in pancreatobiliary endoscopy: a systematic review to highlight areas for improvement.

Abstract：

OBJECTIVE:Increasing attention is paid to measure patient's experience using specific patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) as tool to assess the overall quality of care provided. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and the United European Gastroenterology have recognized the measure of quality of endoscopy facilities as a priority to provide an adequate service. However, although some studies included patient satisfaction measurement, specific PREMs for gastrointestinal endoscopy are limited, especially in the field of pancreatobiliary endoscopy, with heterogeneous methods and results. This study is aimed at systematically reviewing the literature to summarize the available PREMs for pancreatobiliary endoscopy and to highlight areas of implementation. METHODS:PubMed, Embase and Scopus were searched until February 2020. RESULTS:The search initially retrieved 1064 articles, but only six were includable. The identified studies employed several methods to measure patient's experience, with the most frequently used questionnaires being Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Satisfaction Questionnaire and Group Health Association of America-9. The following areas that need implementation were identified: (a) evaluation of pain is one of the most investigated areas but seems marginal, as most pancreatobiliary endoscopic procedures are performed under deep sedation; (b) endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography are considered as a whole, but they have very different indication and contexts (e.g. inpatients or outpatients); (c) 'experience' and 'satisfaction' are wrongly considered as synonyms; (d) the optimal modality and timing of questionnaire administration are unclear. CONCLUSION:There are few tools to measure PREMS in pancreatobiliary endoscopy with several limitations. We have, therefore, started the process of building a specific PREM tool for pancreatobiliary EUS.

journal_name

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol

journal_title

European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology

authors

Apadula L,Capurso G,Arcidiacono PG

doi

10.1097/MEG.0000000000001957

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2020-10-29 00:00:00

eissn

0954-691X

issn

1473-5687

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

Patient-reported experience measure in pancreatobiliary endoscopy: a systematic review to highlight areas for improvement.