当前位置： SCI文献检索 > Journal of Surgical Education期刊下所有文献 > Cadaveric Dissection vs Homemade Model: What is the Best Way to Teach Endoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair?

Cadaveric Dissection vs Homemade Model: What is the Best Way to Teach Endoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair?

Abstract：

BACKGROUND:Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP-IHR) requires practice and training to perform well. We developed a simple, low-cost, inanimate model to teach surgical residents inguinal anatomy and the technique of mesh insertion for a safe, endoscopic TEP-IHR. The objective of this study was to compare our model vs cadaveric dissection for teaching anatomy and mesh insertion. METHODS:A total of 14 general surgery residents participated in an institutional review board approved, prospective, and randomized study. Participants received a timed, web-based, interactive pretest assessing relevant anatomy and operative-based techniques. They then performed endoscopic TEP-IHRs on either a cadaver or our low-cost model. Participants then received a timed, web-based interactive posttest consisting of the same questions. Participants were surveyed anonymously regarding the degree to which either the model or the cadaver was educationally effective. RESULTS:Both groups of trainees (cadaver = 7, low-cost model = 7) scored higher on the posttest (p<0.05) with similar improvement (cadaver group: pretest = 78% correct, posttest = 87%; low-cost model group: 77% vs 86%). Survey results revealed the trainees preferred for both initial learning and understanding of mesh placement using low-cost models (5 out of 5, 4.8/5, respectively) over cadavers (4.0/5, 3.8/5, respectively; p<0.05). Trainees preferred the cadaver (4.7) over the low-cost model (3.9, p<0.05) in overall experience. No differences were found in the trainees' preference between the cadaver (4.5) and low-cost model (4.7) in the overall educational value. CONCLUSION:While the overall educational experience of 14 learners favored a cadaver experience to learn TEP-IHR, initial anatomical learning and placing the mesh was better with an inanimate model. Given the educational value of the 2 methods was equivalent, the $1500 cost for cadavers make the inexpensive and repeatable inanimate model an attractive early resource for learning TEP-IHR.

journal_name

J Surg Educ

journal_title

Journal of surgical education

authors

AlJamal Y,Buckarma E,Ruparel R,Allen S,Farley D

doi

10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.09.003

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2018-01-01 00:00:00

pages

787-791

issue

eissn

1931-7204

issn

1878-7452

pii

S1931-7204(17)30298-2

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章,随机对照试验

在线工具

Cadaveric Dissection vs Homemade Model: What is the Best Way to Teach Endoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair?