当前位置： SCI文献检索 > INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS期刊下所有文献 > Methodologies for assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews.

Methodologies for assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews.

Abstract：

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Previous reviews have expressed concerns about the quality of telemedicine studies. There is debate about shortcomings and appropriate methodologies. The aim of this review of systematic reviews of telemedicine is to summarize methodologies used in telemedicine research, discuss knowledge gaps and recommendations and suggest methodological approaches for further research. METHODS:We conducted a review of systematic reviews of telemedicine according to a protocol listing explicit methods, selection criteria, data collection and quality assessment procedures. We included reviews where authors explicitly addressed and made recommendations for assessment methodologies. We did a qualitative analysis of the reviews included, sensitized by two broad methodological positions; positivist and naturalistic approaches. The analysis focused on methodologies used in the primary studies included in the reviews as reported by the review authors, and methodological recommendations made by the review authors. RESULTS:We identified 1593 titles/abstracts. We included 50 reviews that explicitly addressed assessment methodologies. One group of reviews recommended larger and more rigorously designed controlled studies to assess the impacts of telemedicine; a second group proposed standardisation of populations, and/or interventions and outcome measures to reduce heterogeneity and facilitate meta-analysis; a third group recommended combining quantitative and qualitative research methods; and others applying different naturalistic approaches including methodologies addressing mutual adaptations of services and users; politically driven action research and formative research aimed at collaboration to ensure capacity for improvement of services in natural settings. CONCLUSIONS:Larger and more rigorous studies are crucial for the production of evidence of effectiveness of unambiguous telemedicine services for pre defined outcome measures. Summative methodologies acknowledging telemedicine as complex innovations and outcomes as partly contingent on values, meanings and contexts are also important. So are formative, naturalistic methodologies that acknowledge telemedicine as ongoing collaborative achievements and engage with stakeholders, including patients to produce and conceptualise new and effective telemedicine innovations.

journal_name

Int J Med Inform

journal_title

International journal of medical informatics

authors

Ekeland AG,Bowes A,Flottorp S

doi

10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.10.009

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2012-01-01 00:00:00

pages

1-11

issue

eissn

1386-5056

issn

1872-8243

pii

S1386-5056(11)00219-X

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章,评审

在线工具

Methodologies for assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews.