当前位置： SCI文献检索 > Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine期刊下所有文献 > One-year clinical outcome of angiography, fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio guided percutaneous coronary intervention: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.

One-year clinical outcome of angiography, fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio guided percutaneous coronary intervention: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.

Abstract：

:The present study aimed to compare the clinical outcome of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent a revascularization using conventional coronary angiography or a physiologically guided revascularization with Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR). Furthermore, outcomes in FFR guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) guided PCI were compared. The analysis was performed for reported outcomes at a 1-year follow-up. After searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science for suitable publications, a total of 15,880 subjects were included. Comparing angiography guided and FFR guided PCI showed no significant difference in major adverse cardiac events [odds ratio (OR), 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.59-1.04; P=0.09; I2=73%], death from any cause (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.46-1.18; P=0.20; I2=74%), myocardial infarction (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.81-1.07; P=0.31; I2=0%) or unplanned revascularization (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.41-1.23; P=0.22; I2=79%). In addition, no significant difference could be found between iFR and FFR guided PCI for major adverse cardiac events (OR, 0.97; 95% CI; 0.76-1.23; P=0.81; I2=0%), death from any cause (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.40-1.11; P=0.12; I2=0%), myocardial infarction (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.56-1.24; P=0.37) or unplanned revascularization (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.85-1.58; P=0.34; I2=16%). Overall, there was a tendency towards better outcomes of FFR in all four clinical endpoints compared with angiography guiding of PCI, and furthermore iFR showed no significant inferiority when compared to FFR in said clinical endpoints. When conducting a network meta-analysis, the results confirmed a non-inferiority of iFR compared to angiography guided revascularization.

journal_name

Exp Ther Med

journal_title

Experimental and therapeutic medicine

authors

Baumann S,Mueller KSE,Hetjens S,Eder F,Schaefer AC,Becher T,Borggrefe M,Akin I,Loßnitzer D

doi

10.3892/etm.2019.7156

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2019-03-01 00:00:00

pages

1939-1951

issue

eissn

1792-0981

issn

1792-1015

pii

ETM-0-0-7156

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

One-year clinical outcome of angiography, fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio guided percutaneous coronary intervention: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.