Is medically assisted death a special obligation?

Abstract:

:Several distinct arguments conclude that terminally ill patients have a right to a medically assisted death; two are especially influential: the autonomy argument and the non-harm argument. Both have proven convincing to many, but not to those who view the duty not to kill as an (almost) absolute constraint. Some philosophers see the source of such a constraint in general (deontological) moral principles, other in the nature of the medical profession. My aim in this paper is not to add one further argument in favour of medically assisted death. Rather, I want to shed light on a kind of reason that, to my mind, has not been previously highlighted or defended, and that might shake the principled conviction that doctors are never allowed to actively assist their patients to die. Specifically, my purpose is to show that doctors (as members of the medical profession) have a special duty to provide medically assisted death to consenting terminally ill patients, because (and insofar as) they have been participants in the process leading to the situation in which a patient can reasonably ask to die. In some specific ways (to be explained), they are involved in the tragic fate of those patients and, therefore, are not morally allowed to straightforwardly refuse to assist them to die.

journal_name

J Med Ethics

authors

Rivera-López E

doi

10.1136/medethics-2016-103575

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2017-06-01 00:00:00

pages

401-406

issue

6

eissn

0306-6800

issn

1473-4257

pii

medethics-2016-103575

journal_volume

43

pub_type

杂志文章
  • Understanding respect: learning from patients.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:The importance of respecting patients and participants in clinical research is widely recognised. However, what it means to respect persons beyond recognising them as autonomous is unclear, and little is known about what patients find to be respectful. OBJECTIVE:To understand patients' conceptions of respec...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2008.027235

    authors: Dickert NW,Kass NE

    更新日期:2009-07-01 00:00:00

  • Public healthcare resource allocation and the Rule of Rescue.

    abstract::In healthcare, a tension sometimes arises between the injunction to do as much good as possible with scarce resources and the injunction to rescue identifiable individuals in immediate peril, regardless of cost (the "Rule of Rescue"). This tension can generate serious ethical and political difficulties for public poli...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1136/jme.2007.021790

    authors: Cookson R,McCabe C,Tsuchiya A

    更新日期:2008-07-01 00:00:00

  • Case method.

    abstract::Teaching medical ethics by the case method may be enriched by adding to the principles-and-rules approach to practical reasoning modes of inquiry and interpretation that engage the moral imagination. :Carson and Higgs are strong advocates of the use of case studies in the teaching of medical ethics. Carson maintains...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.12.1.36

    authors: Carson RA

    更新日期:1986-03-01 00:00:00

  • Whole-brain death reconsidered.

    abstract::The author, a philosopher, suggests that the concept of death should be left as it is 'in its present indeterminate state', and that we ought to reject attempts to define death in terms of whole-brain death or any other type of brain death, including cerebral death and 'irreversible coma'. Instead of 'fiddling with th...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.9.1.28

    authors: Browne A

    更新日期:1983-03-01 00:00:00

  • Am I my brother's gatekeeper? Professional ethics and the prioritisation of healthcare.

    abstract::At the 5th International Conference on Priorities in Health Care in Wellington, New Zealand, 2004, one resonating theme was that for priority setting to be effective, it has to include clinicians in both decision making and the enforcement of those decisions. There was, however, a disturbing undertone to this theme, n...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2006.017871

    authors: Hunter D

    更新日期:2007-09-01 00:00:00

  • The role of law in reproductive medicine: a new approach.

    abstract::It is a common feature of debates on the regulation of reproductive medicine to find law portrayed as a crude form of intervention consisting in the imposition of inflexible rules on doctors and medical researchers. This paper argues that this view must be replaced by a more accurate assessment of the law's potential ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.16.1.35

    authors: Jabbari D

    更新日期:1990-03-01 00:00:00

  • Publication ethics and the research assessment exercise: reflections on the troubled question of authorship.

    abstract::The research assessment exercise (RAE) forms the basis for determining the funding of higher education institutions in the UK. Monies are distributed according to a range of performance criteria, the most important of which is "research outputs". Problems to do with publication misconduct, and in particular, issues of...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.26.6.422

    authors: Sheikh A

    更新日期:2000-12-01 00:00:00

  • Does it matter that organ donors are not dead? Ethical and policy implications.

    abstract::The "standard position" on organ donation is that the donor must be dead in order for vital organs to be removed, a position with which we agree. Recently, Robert Truog and Walter Robinson have argued that (1) brain death is not death, and (2) even though "brain dead" patients are not dead, it is morally acceptable to...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1136/jme.2004.010298

    authors: Potts M,Evans DW

    更新日期:2005-07-01 00:00:00

  • Ethical issues in long-term psychiatric management.

    abstract::Two general ethical problems in psychiatry are thrown into sharp relief by long term care. This article discusses each in turn, in the context of two anonymised case studies from actual clinical practice. First, previous mental health legislation soothed doubts about patients' refusal of consent by incorporating time ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.23.5.300

    authors: Dickenson D

    更新日期:1997-10-01 00:00:00

  • The premature breech: caesarean section or trial of labour?

    abstract::Obstetricians face difficult decisions when the interests of fetus and mother conflict. An example is the problem of choosing the delivery method when labour begins prematurely and the fetus is breech. Vaginal delivery involves risks for the breech fetus of brain damage or death caused by umbilical cord compression an...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1136/jme.14.1.18

    authors: Anderson G,Strong C

    更新日期:1988-03-01 00:00:00

  • Routine antenatal HIV testing and informed consent: an unworkable marriage?

    abstract::This paper considers the ethics of routine antenatal HIV testing and the role of informed consent within such a policy in order to decide how we should proceed in this area--a decision that ultimately rests on the relative importance we give to public health goals on the one hand and respect for individual autonomy on...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2006.018861

    authors: Bennett R

    更新日期:2007-08-01 00:00:00

  • How physician executives and clinicians perceive ethical issues in Saudi Arabian hospitals.

    abstract:OBJECTIVES:To compare the perceptions of physician executives and clinicians regarding ethical issues in Saudi Arabian hospitals and the attributes that might lead to the existence of these ethical issues. DESIGN:Self-completion questionnaire administered from February to July 1997. SETTING:Different health regions i...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.25.1.51

    authors: Saeed KS

    更新日期:1999-02-01 00:00:00

  • The gift of blood in Europe: an ethical defence of EC directive 89/381.

    abstract::Article 3.4 of EC directive 89/381 requires member states to take "all necessary measures to promote Community self-sufficiency in human blood or human plasma" and, for this purpose, to "encourage the voluntary unpaid donation of blood and plasma". This paper presents an ethical case in support of the policy of volunt...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.23.2.96

    authors: Keown J

    更新日期:1997-04-01 00:00:00

  • The role of the church in developing the law: an Islamic response.

    abstract::The concept of Hisba in Muslim law has been used by members of certain Islamic groups to impose, through the courts, limitations on freedom of expression. In so doing they sought to circumvent the right of parliament to legislate on matters of personal freedom. This device is now restricted by the Egyptian authorities...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.28.4.223

    authors: Badawi Z

    更新日期:2002-08-01 00:00:00

  • Children, Gillick competency and consent for involvement in research.

    abstract::This paper looks at the issue of consent from children and whether the test of Gillick competency, applied in medical and healthcare practice, ought to extend to participation in research. It is argued that the relatively broad usage of the test of Gillick competency in the medical context should not be considered app...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2006.018853

    authors: Hunter D,Pierscionek BK

    更新日期:2007-11-01 00:00:00

  • What people close to death say about euthanasia and assisted suicide: a qualitative study.

    abstract:OBJECTIVE:To explore the experiences of people with a "terminal illness", focusing on the patients' perspective of euthanasia and assisted suicide. METHOD:A qualitative study using narrative interviews was conducted throughout the UK. The views of the 18 people who discussed euthanasia and assisted suicide were explor...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2006.015883

    authors: Chapple A,Ziebland S,McPherson A,Herxheimer A

    更新日期:2006-12-01 00:00:00

  • 'Serious' science: a response to Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers.

    abstract::In their paper 'The "serious" factor in germline modification', Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers rightly highlight the ambiguity in the oft-utilised term 'serious' in legal discussions of human germline genome modification.1 They suggest interpretation of this term may benefit from a framework based on human rights r...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105764

    authors: Kalsi S

    更新日期:2020-02-01 00:00:00

  • The potential impact of an opt-out system for organ donation in the UK.

    abstract::The recent report of the UK government's Organ Donation Taskforce is in favour of continuing with the current organ donation system rather than changing to an opt-out system where people are assumed to be willing to donate. How did it reach this decision and is it correct? ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2009.031757

    authors: Rieu R

    更新日期:2010-09-01 00:00:00

  • The case of biobank with the law: between a legal and scientific fiction.

    abstract::According to estimates more than 400 biobanks currently operate across Europe. The term 'biobank' indicates a specific field of genetic study that has quietly developed without any significant critical reflection across European societies. Although scientists now routinely use this phrase, the wider public is still co...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2010.041632

    authors: Sándor J,Bárd P,Tamburrini C,Tännsjö T

    更新日期:2012-06-01 00:00:00

  • Misled and confused? Telling the public about MMR vaccine safety. Measles, mumps, and rubella.

    abstract::The extraordinary events surrounding the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine in the United Kingdom have not only placed in jeopardy the use of this triple vaccine but have also spread concern to other parts of the world. Examination of the public's worry about MMR vaccine reveals they have been exposed to a rang...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.29.1.22

    authors: Clements CJ,Ratzan S

    更新日期:2003-02-01 00:00:00

  • Towards a European code of medical ethics. Ethical and legal issues.

    abstract::The feasibility of a common European code of medical ethics is discussed, with consideration and evaluation of the difficulties such a project is going to face, from both the legal and ethical points of view. On the one hand, the analysis will underline the limits of a common European code of medical ethics as an inst...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-102963

    authors: Patuzzo S,Pulice E

    更新日期:2017-01-01 00:00:00

  • Blameworthy bumping? Investigating nudge's neglected cousin.

    abstract::The realm of non-rational influence, which includes nudging, is home to many other morally interesting phenomena. In this paper, I introduce the term bumping, to discuss the category of unintentional non-rational influence. Bumping happens constantly, wherever people make choices in environments where they are affecte...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2018-105179

    authors: Miyata-Sturm A

    更新日期:2019-04-01 00:00:00

  • Training healthcare professionals as moral case deliberation facilitators: evaluation of a Dutch training programme.

    abstract::Until recently, moral case deliberation (MCD) sessions have mostly been facilitated by external experts, mainly professional ethicists. We have developed a train the facilitator programme for healthcare professionals aimed at providing them with the competences needed for being an MCD facilitator. In this paper, we pr...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章,多中心研究

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100546

    authors: Plantinga M,Molewijk B,de Bree M,Moraal M,Verkerk M,Widdershoven GA

    更新日期:2012-10-01 00:00:00

  • Response to: What counts as success in genetic counselling?

    abstract::Clinical genetics encompasses a wider range of activities than discussion of reproductive risks and options. Hence, it is possible for a clinical geneticist to reduce suffering associated with genetic disease without aiming to reduce the birth incidence of such diseases. Simple cost-benefit analyses of genetic-screeni...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.19.1.47

    authors: Clarke A

    更新日期:1993-03-01 00:00:00

  • The role of the principle of double effect in ethics education at US medical schools and its potential impact on pain management at the end of life.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Because opioids can suppress respiratory drive, the principle of double effect (PDE) has been used to justify their use for terminally ill patients. Recent studies, however, suggest that the risk of respiratory depression in typical end-of-life (EOL) situations may be overstated and that heightened concern f...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100105

    authors: Macauley R

    更新日期:2012-03-01 00:00:00

  • When they believe in miracles.

    abstract::Brierley et al argue that in cases where it is medically futile to continue providing life-sustaining therapies to children in intensive care, medical professionals should be allowed to withdraw such therapies, even when the parents of these children believe that there is a chance of a miracle cure taking place. In re...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100677

    authors: Clarke S

    更新日期:2013-09-01 00:00:00

  • The turn for ultimate harm: a reply to Fenton.

    abstract::Elizabeth Fenton has criticised an earlier article by the authors in which the claim was made that, by providing humankind with means of causing its destruction, the advance of science and technology has put it in a perilous condition that might take the development of genetic or biomedical techniques of moral enhance...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2010.036962

    authors: Persson I,Savulescu J

    更新日期:2011-07-01 00:00:00

  • Camouflage is no defence--a response to Kottow.

    abstract::The author responds to Professor Kottow's criticisms, explaining numerous errors and misconceptions. ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.25.4.344

    authors: Seedhouse D

    更新日期:1999-08-01 00:00:00

  • Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries.

    abstract:PURPOSE:Many research ethics committees (RECs) have been established in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in response to increased research in these countries. How well these RECs are functioning remains largely unknown. Our objective was to assess the usefulness of a self-assessment tool in obtaining benchmarki...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101587

    authors: Silverman H,Sleem H,Moodley K,Kumar N,Naidoo S,Subramanian T,Jaafar R,Moni M

    更新日期:2015-04-01 00:00:00

  • Research funding and authorship: does grant winning count towards authorship credit?

    abstract::It is unclear whether or not grant winning should count towards authorship credit in the sciences. In this paper, I argue that under certain circumstances grant winning can count for credit as an author on subsequent works. It is a mistake to think that grant winning is always irrelevant to the correct attribution of ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-101315

    authors: Moffatt B

    更新日期:2014-10-01 00:00:00