当前位置： SCI文献检索 > Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery期刊下所有文献 > Reporting standards for endovascular repair of saccular intracranial cerebral aneurysms.

Reporting standards for endovascular repair of saccular intracranial cerebral aneurysms.

Abstract：

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:The goal of this article is to provide consensus recommendations for reporting standards, terminology, and written definitions when reporting on the radiological evaluation and endovascular treatment of intracranial, cerebral aneurysms. These criteria can be used to design clinical trials, to provide uniformity of definitions for appropriate selection and stratification of patients, and to allow analysis and meta-analysis of reported data. METHODS:This article was written under the auspices of the Joint Writing Group of the Technology Assessment Committee, Society of Neurolnterventional Surgery, Society of Interventional Radiology; Joint Section on Cerebrovascular Neurosurgery of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons; and Section of Stroke and Interventional Neurology of the American Academy of Neurology. A computerized search of the National Library of Medicine database of literature (PubMed) from January 1991 to December 2007 was conducted with the goal to identify published endovascular cerebrovascular interventional data about the assessment and endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms useful as benchmarks for quality assessment. We sought to identify those risk adjustment variables that affect the likelihood of success and complications. This article offers the rationale for different clinical and technical considerations that may be important during the design of clinical trials for endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Included in this guidance article are suggestions for uniform reporting standards for such trials. These definitions and standards are primarily intended for research purposes; however, they should also be helpful in clinical practice and applicable to all publications. CONCLUSIONS:The evaluation and treatment of brain aneurysms often involve multiple medical specialties. Recent reviews by the American Heart Association have surveyed the medical literature to develop guidelines for the clinical management of ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Despite efforts to synthesize existing knowledge on cerebral aneurysm evaluation and treatment, significant inconsistencies remain in nomenclature and definition for research and reporting purposes. These operational definitions were selected by consensus of a multidisciplinary writing group to provide consistency for reporting on imaging in clinical trials and observational studies involving cerebral aneurysms. These definitions should help different groups to publish results that are directly comparable.

journal_name

J Neurointerv Surg

journal_title

Journal of neurointerventional surgery

authors

Meyers PM,Schumacher HC,Higashida RT,Derdeyn CP,Nesbit GM,Sacks D,Wechsler LR,Bederson JB,Lavine SD,Rasmussen P,Joint Writing Group of the Technology Assessment Committee, Society of Neurolnterventional Surgery, Society of Interventi

doi

10.1136/jnis.2010.002337

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2010-12-01 00:00:00

pages

312-23

issue

eissn

1759-8478

issn

1759-8486

pii

jnis.2010.002337

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章,实务指引

在线工具

Reporting standards for endovascular repair of saccular intracranial cerebral aneurysms.