当前位置： SCI文献检索 > JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH期刊下所有文献 > Usage Metrics of Web-Based Interventions Evaluated in Randomized Controlled Trials: Systematic Review.

Usage Metrics of Web-Based Interventions Evaluated in Randomized Controlled Trials: Systematic Review.

Abstract：

BACKGROUND:The evaluation of web-based interventions (defined as an intervention that can be downloaded or accessed on the internet through a web browser) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has increased over the past two decades. Little is known about how participants' use of the intervention is measured, reported, and analyzed in these studies. OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to review the evaluation of web-based interventions in RCTs, assessing study characteristics and the methods used to record, and adjust for, intervention usage. METHODS:A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify all published reports of RCTs that involved a web-based intervention. A random sample of 100 published trials was selected for detailed data extraction. Information on trial characteristics was extracted, including whether web usage data were recorded, and if so, the methods used to gather these data and whether these data were used to inform efficacy analyses. RESULTS:A PubMed search identified 812 trials of web-based interventions published up to the end of 2017 and demonstrated a growing trend over time. Of the 100 studies reviewed, 90 studies collected web usage data, but more than half (49/90, 54%) of these studies did not state the method used for recording web usage. Only four studies attempted to check on the reliability of their web usage data collection methods. A total of 39% (35/90) studies reported patterns or levels of web intervention use, of which 21% (19/90) studies adjusted for intervention use in their outcome analysis, but only two of these used appropriate statistical methods. CONCLUSIONS:Trialists frequently report a measure of web-based intervention usage but do not always report the collection method or provide enough detail on their analysis of web usage. Appropriate statistical methods to account for intervention use are rarely used and are not well reported even in the very few trials in which they are used. The number of trialists who attempt to check on the reliability of their web usage collection methods is extremely low.

journal_name

J Med Internet Res

journal_title

Journal of medical Internet research

authors

Koneska E,Appelbe D,Williamson PR,Dodd S

doi

10.2196/15474

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2020-04-16 00:00:00

pages

e15474

issue

eissn

1439-4456

issn

1438-8871

pii

v22i4e15474

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

Usage Metrics of Web-Based Interventions Evaluated in Randomized Controlled Trials: Systematic Review.