当前位置： SCI文献检索 > BMC CANCER期刊下所有文献 > Efficacy and safety of afatinib in Chinese patients with EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously responsive to first-generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI) and chemotherapy: comparison with historical cohort using erloti

Efficacy and safety of afatinib in Chinese patients with EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously responsive to first-generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI) and chemotherapy: comparison with historical cohort using erloti

Abstract：

BACKGROUND:Afaitnib has shown anti-tumor activity against metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC after prior failure to first generation EGFR-TKI and chemotherapy. We prospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of afatinib in Chinese patients who previously failed first-generation TKI and chemotherapy under a compassionate use program (CUP) and compared to the erlotinib cohort. METHODS:Patients who suffered from metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC previously responsive to first-generation TKI and chemotherapy received afatinib until progression, loss of clinical benefits or intolerable toxicity. Treatment response, survival and safety were evaluated and compared to the erlotinib cohort. RESULTS:Twenty-five and 28 patients received afatinib and erlotinib respectively. More patients in the afatinib group had worse performance status (ECOG 2) than the erlotinib group (p = 0.008). After a median follow-up of 12.1 months, afatinib demonstrated comparable objective response rate (ORR) (20.0% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.17) but significantly higher disease control rate (DCR) (68.0% vs. 39.3%, p = 0.04) compared to erlotinib. Median progression-free survival (PFS) (4.1 months [95% CI, 2.7-5.5 months] vs. 3.3 months [95% CI, 2.2-4.3 months], p = 0.97) and overall survival (OS) were not different between the two groups (10.3 months [95% CI, 7.5-13.0 months] vs. 10.8 months [95% CI, 7.4-14.2 months], p = 0.51). Multivariate analyses revealed that age ≤ 70 years and time to progression (TTP) ≥ 18 months for the 1st TKI therapy were prognostic of PFS (p = 0.006 and p = 0.008 respectively). Afatinib caused less rash (60.0% vs. 67.9%, p = 0.04) but more diarrhea (60.0% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.002) compared to erlotinib. CONCLUSION:Afatinib produced encouraging clinical efficacy as 2nd TKI therapy with manageable safety profiles in our Chinese patients after failure to another TKI and systemic chemotherapy. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02625168) on 3rd December 2015.

journal_name

BMC Cancer

journal_title

BMC cancer

authors

Lee VH,Leung DK,Choy TS,Lam KO,Lam PM,Leung TW,Kwong DL

doi

10.1186/s12885-016-2201-9

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2016-02-24 00:00:00

pages

147

issn

1471-2407

pii

10.1186/s12885-016-2201-9

journal_volume

pub_type

临床试验,杂志文章

在线工具

Efficacy and safety of afatinib in Chinese patients with EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously responsive to first-generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI) and chemotherapy: comparison with historical cohort using erloti