Indicators of sustainable capacity building for health research: analysis of four African case studies.

Abstract:

BACKGROUND:Despite substantial investment in health capacity building in developing countries, evaluations of capacity building effectiveness are scarce. By analysing projects in Africa that had successfully built sustainable capacity, we aimed to identify evidence that could indicate that capacity building was likely to be sustainable. METHODS:Four projects were selected as case studies using pre-determined criteria, including the achievement of sustainable capacity. By mapping the capacity building activities in each case study onto a framework previously used for evaluating health research capacity in Ghana, we were able to identify activities that were common to all projects. We used these activities to derive indicators which could be used in other projects to monitor progress towards building sustainable research capacity. RESULTS:Indicators of sustainable capacity building increased in complexity as projects matured and included- early engagement of stakeholders; explicit plans for scale up; strategies for influencing policies; quality assessments (awareness and experiential stages)- improved resources; institutionalisation of activities; innovation (expansion stage)- funding for core activities secured; management and decision-making led by southern partners (consolidation stage).Projects became sustainable after a median of 66 months. The main challenges to achieving sustainability were high turnover of staff and stakeholders, and difficulties in embedding new activities into existing systems, securing funding and influencing policy development. CONCLUSIONS:Our indicators of sustainable capacity building need to be tested prospectively in a variety of projects to assess their usefulness. For each project the evidence required to show that indicators have been achieved should evolve with the project and they should be determined prospectively in collaboration with stakeholders.

journal_name

Health Res Policy Syst

authors

Bates I,Taegtmeyer M,Squire SB,Ansong D,Nhlema-Simwaka B,Baba A,Theobald S

doi

10.1186/1478-4505-9-14

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2011-03-28 00:00:00

pages

14

issn

1478-4505

pii

1478-4505-9-14

journal_volume

9

pub_type

杂志文章
  • Policy context and narrative leading to the commissioning of the Australian Indigenous Burden of Disease study.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Burden of disease (BoD) studies have been conducted in numerous international settings since the early 1990's. Two national BoD studies have been undertaken in Australia, in 1998 and 2003, although neither study estimated the BoD specifically for Indigenous Australians. In 2005 the Australian Government Depa...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0004-0

    authors: Botfield JR,Zwi AB,Hill PS

    更新日期:2015-03-15 00:00:00

  • Developing pathways for community-led research with big data: a content analysis of stakeholder interviews.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Big data (BD) informs nearly every aspect of our lives and, in health research, is the foundation for basic discovery and its tailored translation into healthcare. Yet, as new data resources and citizen/patient-led science movements offer sites of innovation, segments of the population with the lowest health...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1186/s12961-020-00589-7

    authors: Grayson S,Doerr M,Yu JH

    更新日期:2020-07-08 00:00:00

  • Using an equity-based framework for evaluating publicly funded health insurance programmes as an instrument of UHC in Chhattisgarh State, India.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Universal health coverage (UHC) has provided the impetus for the introduction of publicly funded health insurance (PFHI) schemes in the mixed health systems of India and many other low- and middle-income countries. There is a need for a holistic understanding of the pathways of impact of PFHI schemes, includ...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1186/s12961-020-00555-3

    authors: Nandi S,Schneider H

    更新日期:2020-05-25 00:00:00

  • How do we define the policy impact of public health research? A systematic review.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:In order to understand and measure the policy impact of research we need a definition of research impact that is suited to the task. This article systematically reviewed both peer-reviewed and grey literature for definitions of research impact to develop a definition of research impact that can be used to in...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1186/s12961-017-0247-z

    authors: Alla K,Hall WD,Whiteford HA,Head BW,Meurk CS

    更新日期:2017-10-02 00:00:00

  • Continuation rates and reasons for discontinuation of intra-uterine device in three provinces of Pakistan: results of a 24-month prospective client follow-up.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Long-acting reversible contraceptives, such as the intrauterine device (IUD), remain underutilised in Pakistan with high discontinuation rates. Based on a 24-month prospective client follow-up (nested within a larger quasi-experimental study), this paper presents the comparison of two intervention models, on...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0040-9

    authors: Hameed W,Azmat SK,Ishaque M,Hussain W,Munroe E,Mustafa G,Khan OF,Abbas G,Ali S,Asghar QJ,Ali S,Ahmed A,Hamza HB

    更新日期:2015-11-25 00:00:00

  • The Quality Improvement Demonstration Study: an example of evidence-based policy-making in practice.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Randomized trials have long been the gold-standard for evaluating clinical practice. There is growing recognition that rigorous studies are similarly needed to assess the effects of policy. However, these studies are rarely conducted. We report on the Quality Improvement Demonstration Study (QIDS), an exampl...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1186/1478-4505-6-5

    authors: Shimkhada R,Peabody JW,Quimbo SA,Solon O

    更新日期:2008-03-25 00:00:00

  • Research dissemination workshops: observations and implications based on an experience in Burkina Faso.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:In Burkina Faso, malaria remains the primary cause of healthcare use, morbidity and child mortality. Therefore, efforts are needed to support the knowledge transfer and application of the results of numerous studies to better formulate and implement programs in the fight against the malaria pandemic. To this...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1186/s12961-017-0205-9

    authors: Mc Sween-Cadieux E,Dagenais C,Somé PA,Ridde V

    更新日期:2017-06-02 00:00:00

  • Impact of NIHR HTA Programme funded research on NICE clinical guidelines: a retrospective cohort.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:It is vitally important that there is a connection between health research and clinical practice. Indications as to the impact of the research on evidence-based practice and policy can be obtained by tracking the use of outputs of health research, especially its use in clinical guidelines (CGs). This study a...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0025-8

    authors: Turner S,Bhurke S,Cook A

    更新日期:2015-08-22 00:00:00

  • Knowledge translation for realist reviews: a participatory approach for a review on scaling up complex interventions.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Knowledge syntheses that use a realist methodology are gaining popularity. Yet, there are few reports in the literature that describe how results are summarised, shared and used. This paper aims to inform knowledge translation (KT) for realist reviews by describing the process of developing a KT strategy for...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1186/s12961-018-0374-1

    authors: Boyko JA,Riley BL,Willis CD,Stockton L,Zummach D,Kerner J,Robinson K,Chia M

    更新日期:2018-10-22 00:00:00

  • Building health research systems to achieve better health.

    abstract::Health research systems can link knowledge generation with practical concerns to improve health and health equity. Interest in health research, and in how health research systems should best be organised, is moving up the agenda of bodies such as the World Health Organisation. Pioneering health research systems, for e...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 社论

    doi:10.1186/1478-4505-4-10

    authors: Hanney SR,González Block MA

    更新日期:2006-11-06 00:00:00

  • Learning sites for health system governance in Kenya and South Africa: reflecting on our experience.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Health system governance is widely recognised as critical to well-performing health systems in low- and middle-income countries. However, in 2008, the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research identified governance as a neglected health systems research issue. Given the demands of such research, the Al...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 信件

    doi:10.1186/s12961-020-00552-6

    authors: RESYST\/DIAHLS learning site team.

    更新日期:2020-05-11 00:00:00

  • Striving for better health through health research in post-conflict Timor-Leste.

    abstract::The Cabinet of Health Research and Development (CHRD) has recently been established as the first health research institute in one of the world's newest nations, Timor-Leste. We discuss the development of this initiative to build health research capacity within the context of Timor-Leste's health system, history and fu...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 社论

    doi:10.1186/1478-4505-10-13

    authors: Martins N,Hawkins Z

    更新日期:2012-04-10 00:00:00

  • Participatory monitoring and evaluation approaches that influence decision-making: lessons from a maternal and newborn study in Eastern Uganda.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:The use of participatory monitoring and evaluation (M&E) approaches is important for guiding local decision-making, promoting the implementation of effective interventions and addressing emerging issues in the course of implementation. In this article, we explore how participatory M&E approaches helped to id...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1186/s12961-017-0274-9

    authors: Kananura RM,Ekirapa-Kiracho E,Paina L,Bumba A,Mulekwa G,Nakiganda-Busiku D,Oo HNL,Kiwanuka SN,George A,Peters DH

    更新日期:2017-12-28 00:00:00

  • Implementing without guidelines, learning at the coalface: a case study of health promoters in an era of community health workers in South Africa.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Internationally, there has been renewed focus on primary healthcare (PHC). PHC revitalisation is one of the mechanisms to emphasise health promotion and prevention. However, it is not always clear who should lead health promotion activities. In some countries, health promotion practitioners provide health pr...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1186/s12961-020-00561-5

    authors: Rwafa-Ponela T,Eyles J,Christofides N,Goudge J

    更新日期:2020-05-14 00:00:00

  • Examining the use of health systems and policy research in the health policymaking process in Israel: views of researchers.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:All too often, health policy and management decisions are made without making use of or consulting with the best available research evidence, which can lead to ineffective and inefficient health systems. One of the main actors that can ensure the use of evidence to inform policymaking is researchers. The obj...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1186/s12961-016-0139-7

    authors: Ellen ME,Lavis JN,Shemer J

    更新日期:2016-09-01 00:00:00

  • Four normative perspectives on public health policy-making and their preferences for bodies of evidence.

    abstract::Calls for evidence-informed public health policy-making often ignore that there are multiple, and often competing, bodies of potentially relevant evidence to which policy-makers have recourse in identifying policy priorities and taking decisions. In this paper, we illustrate how policy frames may favour the use of spe...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 信件

    doi:10.1186/s12961-020-00614-9

    authors: Schoemaker CG,van Loon J,Achterberg PW,den Hertog FRJ,Hilderink H,Melse J,Vonk RAA,van Oers H

    更新日期:2020-08-24 00:00:00

  • Supporting the use of research evidence in decision-making in crisis zones in low- and middle-income countries: a critical interpretive synthesis.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Decision-makers in crisis zones are faced with the challenge of having to make health-related decisions under limited time and resource constraints and in light of the many factors that can influence their decisions, of which research evidence is just one. To address a key gap in the research literature abou...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1186/s12961-020-0530-2

    authors: Khalid AF,Lavis JN,El-Jardali F,Vanstone M

    更新日期:2020-02-18 00:00:00

  • A systematic review of health technology assessment tools in sub-Saharan Africa: methodological issues and implications.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Health technology assessment (HTA) is mostly used in the context of high- and middle-income countries. Many "resource-poor" settings, which have the greatest need for critical assessment of health technology, have a limited basis for making evidence-based choices. This can lead to inappropriate use of techno...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1186/1478-4505-12-66

    authors: Kriza C,Hanass-Hancock J,Odame EA,Deghaye N,Aman R,Wahlster P,Marin M,Gebe N,Akhwale W,Wachsmuth I,Kolominsky-Rabas PL

    更新日期:2014-12-02 00:00:00

  • Informing the establishment of the WHO Global Observatory on Health Research and Development: a call for papers.

    abstract::In May 2013, the WHO Member States requested the WHO to establish a Global Observatory on Health Research and Development (R&D), as part of a strategic work-plan to promote innovation, build capacity, improve access, and mobilize resources to address diseases that disproportionately affect the world's poorest countrie...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1186/1478-4505-13-9

    authors: Adam T,Røttingen JA,Kieny MP

    更新日期:2015-02-02 00:00:00

  • Role and use of evidence in policymaking: an analysis of case studies from the health sector in Nigeria.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Health policymaking is a complex process and analysing the role of evidence is still an evolving area in many low- and middle-income countries. Where evidence is used, it is greatly affected by cognitive and institutional features of the policy process. This paper examines the role of different types of evid...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0049-0

    authors: Onwujekwe O,Uguru N,Russo G,Etiaba E,Mbachu C,Mirzoev T,Uzochukwu B

    更新日期:2015-10-24 00:00:00

  • The Palestinian health research system: who orchestrates the system, how and based on what? A qualitative assessment.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:In 2011, the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region committee launched a strategy for scaling up research in the region to address the countries' health needs through formulating and analysing the National Health Research System (HRS). Stewardship comprises three functions, namely governance, policy and priorities...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1186/s12961-018-0347-4

    authors: AlKhaldi M,Alkaiyat A,Abed Y,Pfeiffer C,Halaseh R,Salah R,Idries M,Abueida S,Idries I,Jeries I,Meghari H,Shaar A,Tanner M,Haj-Yahia S

    更新日期:2018-07-31 00:00:00

  • A comparative evaluation of PDQ-Evidence.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:A strategy for minimising the time and obstacles to accessing systematic reviews of health system evidence is to collect them in a freely available database and make them easy to find through a simple 'Google-style' search interface. PDQ-Evidence was developed in this way. The objective of this study was to ...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 杂志文章,随机对照试验

    doi:10.1186/s12961-018-0299-8

    authors: Johansen M,Rada G,Rosenbaum S,Paulsen E,Motaze NV,Opiyo N,Wiysonge CS,Ding Y,Mukinda FK,Oxman AD

    更新日期:2018-03-15 00:00:00

  • Development of rapid guidelines: 2. A qualitative study with WHO guideline developers.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Situations such as public health emergencies and outbreaks necessitate the development and publication of high-quality recommendations within a condensed timeframe. For example, WHO has produced examples of and guidance for the development of rapid guidelines (RGs). However, more information is needed to und...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1186/s12961-018-0329-6

    authors: Florez ID,Morgan RL,Falavigna M,Kowalski SC,Zhang Y,Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I,Santesso N,Wiercioch W,Schünemann HJ

    更新日期:2018-07-13 00:00:00

  • Evidence for Health II: Overcoming barriers to using evidence in policy and practice.

    abstract::Even the highest quality evidence will have little impact unless it is incorporated into decision-making for health. It is therefore critical to overcome the many barriers to using evidence in decision-making, including (1) missing the window of opportunity, (2) knowledge gaps and uncertainty, (3) controversy, irrelev...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1186/s12961-016-0086-3

    authors: Andermann A,Pang T,Newton JN,Davis A,Panisset U

    更新日期:2016-03-14 00:00:00

  • Post-doctoral research fellowship as a health policy and systems research capacity development intervention: a case of the CHESAI initiative.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Building capacity in health policy and systems research (HPSR), especially in low- and middle-income countries, remains a challenge. Various approaches have been suggested and implemented by scholars and institutions using various forms of capacity building to address challenges regarding HPSR development. T...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1186/s12961-016-0159-3

    authors: Lembani M,Teddy G,Molosiwa D,Hwabamungu B

    更新日期:2016-12-20 00:00:00

  • SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 10: Taking equity into consideration when assessing the findings of a systematic review.

    abstract::This article is part of a series written for people responsible for making decisions about health policies and programmes and for those who support these decision makers. In this article we address considerations of equity. Inequities can be defined as "differences in health which are not only unnecessary and avoidabl...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S10

    authors: Oxman AD,Lavis JN,Lewin S,Fretheim A

    更新日期:2009-12-16 00:00:00

  • The opioid crisis: a contextual, social-ecological framework.

    abstract::The prevalence of opioid use and misuse has provoked a staggering number of deaths over the past two and a half decades. Much attention has focused on individual risks according to various characteristics and experiences. However, broader social and contextual domains are also essential contributors to the opioid cris...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 信件

    doi:10.1186/s12961-020-00596-8

    authors: Jalali MS,Botticelli M,Hwang RC,Koh HK,McHugh RK

    更新日期:2020-08-06 00:00:00

  • Community-based organizations in the health sector: a scoping review.

    abstract::Community-based organizations are important health system stakeholders as they provide numerous, often highly valued programs and services to the members of their community. However, community-based organizations are described using diverse terminology and concepts from across a range of disciplines. To better underst...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1186/1478-4505-10-36

    authors: Wilson MG,Lavis JN,Guta A

    更新日期:2012-11-21 00:00:00

  • An academic perspective of participation in healthcare redesign.

    abstract::Healthcare redesign, based on building collaborative capacity between academic and clinical partners, should create a method to facilitate flow between the key elements of health service improvement. However, utilising the skills and resources of an organisation outside of the health facility may not always have the d...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 信件

    doi:10.1186/s12961-019-0486-2

    authors: Prior SJ,Mather C,Miller A,Campbell S

    更新日期:2019-11-20 00:00:00

  • Cross-sector cooperation in health-enhancing physical activity policymaking: more potential than achievements?

    abstract:BACKGROUND:The cooperation of actors across policy fields and the need for cross-sector cooperation as well as recommendations on how to implement cross-sector cooperation have been addressed in many national and international policies that seek to solve complex issues within societies. For such a purpose, the relevant...

    journal_title:Health research policy and systems

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1186/s12961-016-0103-6

    authors: Hämäläinen RM,Aro AR,Lau CJ,Rus D,Cori L,Syed AM,REsearch into POlicy to enhance Physical Activity (REPOPA) Consortium.

    更新日期:2016-04-29 00:00:00