当前位置： SCI文献检索 > AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL期刊下所有文献 > A descriptive review of malpractice claims for health care-acquired infections in Philadelphia.

A descriptive review of malpractice claims for health care-acquired infections in Philadelphia.

Abstract：

BACKGROUND:Philadelphia's rate of malpractice filings per population is just over double the national median. Plaintiffs prevail in 44% of verdicts in Philadelphia compared with 20% for all US jury verdicts, with 24% of awarded verdicts in excess of $1 million. OBJECTIVE:To determine patient and procedure demographic data for malpractice claims involving health care-acquired infections (HAIs) in Philadelphia. METHODS:Risk managers representing 60 acute care hospitals, members of Pennsylvania Trial Lawyers Association, and a random sample of 560 lawyers representing plaintiff and defense cases obtained from the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas database (1996-2002) were surveyed. The survey included the following: number of HAI cases by specialty, body site, isolate, and outcome. RESULTS:Overall response rate was 25% (n = 154 cases). The highest numbers of cases were in the specialties of orthopedics (69), general surgery (20), and cardiothoracic (20). Sites infected most often were as follows: knees (26), back (26), sternum (18), and harvest site (10). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was responsible for 45 of cases, S epidermidis for 27, methicillin-susceptible S aureus (MSSA) for 14, and Pseudomonas for 16. Twenty-seven of the cases were withdrawn, 27 settled, 11 pending, 9 plaintiff verdict, and 5 defense verdict. CONCLUSIONS:Although 72% of HAI malpractice cases in Philadelphia were either withdrawn or settled, when brought to trial, the plaintiff was more likely to succeed with a verdict. Our findings also suggest that the most frequent type of infection (class I-surgical site) and isolate (MRSA) are more likely to be seen as preventable HAIs because of National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance data showing lower infection rates for this class of surgery and therefore seen as easier for the plaintiff to show that the defendant failed to adhere to the standard of care for infection control.

journal_name

Am J Infect Control

journal_title

American journal of infection control

authors

Guinan JL,McGuckin M,Shubin A,Tighe J

doi

10.1016/j.ajic.2005.03.005

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2005-06-01 00:00:00

pages

310-2

issue

eissn

0196-6553

issn

1527-3296

pii

S0196655305000714

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

A descriptive review of malpractice claims for health care-acquired infections in Philadelphia.