当前位置： SCI文献检索 > INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES期刊下所有文献 > The association between 12-hour shifts and nurses-in-charge's perceptions of missed care and staffing adequacy: a retrospective cross-sectional observational study.

The association between 12-hour shifts and nurses-in-charge's perceptions of missed care and staffing adequacy: a retrospective cross-sectional observational study.

Abstract：

BACKGROUND:Due to worldwide nursing shortages and difficulty retaining staff, long shifts for nursing staff (both registered nurses and nursing assistants) working in hospitals have been adopted widely. Because long shifts reduce the daily number of shifts from three to two, many assume that long shifts improve productivity by removing one handover and staff overlap. However, it is unclear whether staffing levels are more likely to be perceived as adequate when more long shifts are used. OBJECTIVES:To investigate the association between the proportion of long (≥12-hour) shifts worked on a ward and nurses-in-charge's perceptions that the staffing level was sufficient to meet patient need. METHODS:A retrospective cross-sectional study using routinely collected data (patient administrative data and rosters) linked to nurses-in-charge's reports from 81 wards within four English hospitals across 1 year (2017). Hierarchical logistic regression models were used to determine associations between the proportion of long shifts and nurses-in-charge's reports of having enough staff for quality or leaving necessary nursing care undone, after controlling for the staffing level relative to demand (shortfall). We tested for interactions between staffing shortfall and the proportion of long shifts. RESULTS:The sample comprised 19648 ward days. On average across wards, 72% of shifts were long. With mixed short and long shifts, the odds of nurses-in-charge reporting that there were enough staff for quality were 14-17% lower than when all shifts were long. For example, the odds of reporting enough staff for quality with between 60-80% long shifts was 15% lower (95% confidence interval 2% to 27%) than with all long shifts. Associations with nursing care left undone were consistent with this pattern. Although including interactions between staffing shortfalls and the proportion of long shifts did not improve model fit, the effect of long shifts did appear to differ according to shortfall, with lower proportions of long shifts associated with benefits when staffing levels were high relative to current norms. CONCLUSIONS:Rather than a clear distinction between wards using short and long shifts, we found that a mixed pattern operated on most days and wards, with no wards using all short shifts. We found that when wards use exclusively long shifts rather than a mixture, nurses-in-charge are more likely to judge that they have enough staff. However, the adverse effects of mixed shifts on perceptions of staffing adequacy may be reduced or eliminated by higher staffing levels. ISRCTN 12307968. Tweetable abstract 12-hour shifts in nursing: a mix of short and long shifts may be worse than all long shifts.

journal_name

Int J Nurs Stud

journal_title

International journal of nursing studies

authors

Saville C,Dall'Ora C,Griffiths P

doi

10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103702

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2020-06-30 00:00:00

pages

103702

eissn

0020-7489

issn

1873-491X

pii

S0020-7489(20)30188-7

journal_volume

109

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

The association between 12-hour shifts and nurses-in-charge's perceptions of missed care and staffing adequacy: a retrospective cross-sectional observational study.