当前位置： SCI文献检索 > BMC GENOMICS期刊下所有文献 > Evaluation of viral genome assembly and diversity estimation in deep metagenomes.

Evaluation of viral genome assembly and diversity estimation in deep metagenomes.

Abstract：

BACKGROUND:Viruses have unique properties, small genome and regions of high similarity, whose effects on metagenomic assemblies have not been characterized so far. This study uses diverse in silico simulated viromes to evaluate how extensively genomes can be assembled using different sequencing platforms and assemblers. Further, it investigates the suitability of different methods to estimate viral diversity in metagenomes. RESULTS:We created in silico metagenomes mimicking various platforms at different sequencing depths. The CLC assembler revealed subpar compared to IDBA_UD and CAMERA , which are metagenomic-specific. Up to a saturation point, Illumina platforms proved more capable of reconstructing large portions of viral genomes compared to 454. Read length was an important factor for limiting chimericity, while scaffolding marginally improved contig length and accuracy. The genome length of the various viruses in the metagenomes did not significantly affect genome reconstruction, but the co-existence of highly similar genomes was detrimental. When evaluating diversity estimation tools, we found that PHACCS results were more accurate than those from CatchAll and clustering, which were both orders of magnitude above expected. CONCLUSIONS:Assemblers designed specifically for the analysis of metagenomes should be used to facilitate the creation of high-quality long contigs. Despite the high coverage possible, scientists should not expect to always obtain complete genomes, because their reconstruction may be hindered by co-existing species bearing highly similar genomic regions. Further development of metagenomics-oriented assemblers may help bypass these limitations in future studies. Meanwhile, the lack of fully reconstructed communities keeps methods to estimate viral diversity relevant. While none of the three methods tested had absolute precision, only PHACCS was deemed suitable for comparative studies.

journal_name

BMC Genomics

journal_title

BMC genomics

authors

Aguirre de Cárcer D,Angly FE,Alcamí A

doi

10.1186/1471-2164-15-989

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2014-11-18 00:00:00

pages

989

issn

1471-2164

pii

1471-2164-15-989

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

Evaluation of viral genome assembly and diversity estimation in deep metagenomes.