当前位置： SCI文献检索 > Cardiovascular Ultrasound期刊下所有文献 > Head to head comparison of 2D vs real time 3D dipyridamole stress echocardiography.

Head to head comparison of 2D vs real time 3D dipyridamole stress echocardiography.

Abstract：

:Real-time three-dimensional (RT-3D) echocardiography has entered the clinical practice but true incremental value over standard two-dimensional echocardiography (2D) remains uncertain when applied to stress echo. The aim of the present study is to establish the additional value of RT-3D stress echo over standard 2D stress echocardiography. We evaluated 23 consecutive patients (age = 65 +/- 10 years, 16 men) referred for dipyridamole stress echocardiography with Sonos 7500 (Philips Medical Systems, Palo, Alto, CA) equipped with a phased - array 1.6-2.5 MHz probe with second harmonic capability for 2D imaging and a 2-4 MHz matrix-phased array transducer producing 60 x 70 volumetric pyramidal data containing the entire left ventricle for RT-3D imaging. In all patients, images were digitally stored in 2D and 3D for baseline and peak stress with a delay between acquisitions of less than 60 seconds. Wall motion analysis was interpreted on-line for 2D and off-line for RT-3D by joint reading of two expert stress ecocardiographist. Segmental image quality was scored from 1 = excellent to 5 = uninterpretable. Interpretable images were obtained in all patients. Acquisition time for 2D images was 67 +/- 21 sec vs 40 +/- 22 sec for RT-3D (p = 0.5). Wall motion analysis time was 2.8 +/- 0.5 min for 2D and 13 +/- 7 min for 3D (p = 0.0001). Segmental image quality score was 1.4 +/- 0.5 for 2D and 2.6 +/- 0.7 for 3D (p = 0.0001). Positive test results was found in 5/23 patients. 2D and RT-3D were in agreement in 3 out of these 5 positive exams. Overall stress result (positive vs negative) concordance was 91% (Kappa = 0.80) between 2D and RT-3D. During dipyridamole stress echocardiography RT-3D imaging is highly feasible and shows a high concordance rate with standard 2D stress echo. 2D images take longer time to acquire and RT-3D is more time-consuming to analyze. At present, there is no clear clinical advantage justifying routine RT-3D stress echocardiography use.

journal_name

Cardiovasc Ultrasound

journal_title

Cardiovascular ultrasound

authors

Varnero S,Santagata P,Pratali L,Basso M,Gandolfo A,Bellotti P

doi

10.1186/1476-7120-6-31

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2008-06-20 00:00:00

pages

issn

1476-7120

pii

1476-7120-6-31

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

Head to head comparison of 2D vs real time 3D dipyridamole stress echocardiography.