Variation in cardiovascular disease care: an Australian cohort study on sex differences in receipt of coronary procedures.

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES:The aim of this study was to quantify sex differences in diagnostic and revascularisation coronary procedures within 1 year of hospitalisation for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or angina. DESIGN:This is a prospective cohort study. Baseline questionnaire (January 2006-April 2009) data from the Sax Institute's 45 and Up Study were linked to hospitalisation and mortality data (to 30 June 2016) in a time-to-event analysis, treating death as a censoring event. SETTING:This was conducted in New South Wales, Australia. PARTICIPANTS:The study included participants aged ≥45 years with no history of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) who were admitted to hospital with a primary diagnosis of AMI (n=4580) or a primary diagnosis of angina or chronic IHD with secondary diagnosis of angina (n=4457). OUTCOME MEASURES:The outcome of this study was coronary angiography and coronary revascularisation with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft (PCI/CABG) within 1 year of index admission. Cox regression models compared coronary procedure rates in men and women, adjusting sequentially for age, sociodemographic variables and health characteristics. RESULTS:Among patients with AMI, 71.6% of men (crude rate 3.45/person-year) and 64.7% of women (2.62/person-year) received angiography; 57.8% of men (1.73/person-year) and 37.4% of women (0.77/person-year) received PCI/CABG. Adjusted HRs for men versus women were 1.00 (0.92-1.08) for angiography and 1.51 (1.38-1.67) for PCI/CABG. In the angina group, 67.3% of men (crude rate 2.36/person-year) and 54.9% of women (1.32/person-year) received angiography; 44.6% of men (0.90/person-year) and 19.5% of women (0.26/person-year) received PCI/CABG. Adjusted HRs were 1.24 (1.14-1.34) and 2.44 (2.16-2.75), respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Men are more likely than women to receive coronary procedures, particularly revascularisation. This difference is most evident among people with angina, where clinical guidelines are less prescriptive than for AMI.

journal_name

BMJ Open

journal_title

BMJ open

authors

Fogg AJ,Welsh J,Banks E,Abhayaratna W,Korda RJ

doi

10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026507

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2019-07-23 00:00:00

pages

e026507

issue

7

issn

2044-6055

pii

bmjopen-2018-026507

journal_volume

9

pub_type

杂志文章

相关文献

BMJ Open文献大全