当前位置： SCI文献检索 > BMJ Open期刊下所有文献 > Balance and walking after three different models of stroke rehabilitation: early supported discharge in a day unit or at home, and traditional treatment (control).

Balance and walking after three different models of stroke rehabilitation: early supported discharge in a day unit or at home, and traditional treatment (control).

Abstract：

OBJECTIVE:To compare the effects on balance and walking of three models of stroke rehabilitation: early supported discharge with rehabilitation in a day unit or at home, and traditional uncoordinated treatment (control). DESIGN:Group comparison study within a randomised controlled trial. SETTING:Hospital stroke unit and primary healthcare. PARTICIPANTS: INCLUSION CRITERIA:a score of 2-26 on National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, assessed with Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke (PASS), and discharge directly home from the hospital stroke unit. INTERVENTIONS:Two intervention groups were given early supported discharge with treatment in either a day unit or the patient's own home. The controls were offered traditional, uncoordinated treatment. OUTCOME MEASURES:Primary: PASS. Secondary: Trunk Impairment Scale-modified Norwegian version; timed Up-and-Go; 5 m timed walk; self-reports on problems with walking, balance, ADL, physical activity, pain and tiredness. The patients were tested before randomisation and 3 months after inclusion. RESULTS:From a total of 306 randomised patients, 167 were tested with PASS at baseline and discharged directly home. 105 were retested at 3 months: mean age 69 years, 63 men, 27 patients in day unit rehabilitation, 43 in home rehabilitation and 35 in a control group. There were no group differences, either at baseline for demographic and test data or for length of stroke unit stay. At 3 months, there was no group difference in change on PASS (p>0.05). Some secondary measures tended to show better outcome for the intervention groups, that is, trunk control, median (95% CI): day unit, 2 (0.28 to 2.31); home rehabilitation, 4 (1.80 to 3.78); control, 1 (0.56 to 2.53), p=0.044; and for self-report on walking, p=0.021 and ADL, p=0.016. CONCLUSIONS:There was no difference in change between the groups for postural balance, but the secondary outcomes indicated that improvement of trunk control and walking was better in the intervention groups than in the control group. TRIAL REGISTRATION:This study is part of the Early Supported Discharge after Stroke in Bergen, ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00771771).

journal_name

BMJ Open

journal_title

BMJ open

authors

Gjelsvik BE,Hofstad H,Smedal T,Eide GE,Næss H,Skouen JS,Frisk B,Daltveit S,Strand LI

doi

10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004358

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2014-05-14 00:00:00

pages

e004358

issue

issn

2044-6055

pii

bmjopen-2013-004358

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章,随机对照试验

在线工具

Balance and walking after three different models of stroke rehabilitation: early supported discharge in a day unit or at home, and traditional treatment (control).