当前位置： SCI文献检索 > JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE期刊下所有文献 > Professional judgement in clinical practice (part 3): A better alternative to strong evidence-based medicine.

Professional judgement in clinical practice (part 3): A better alternative to strong evidence-based medicine.

Abstract：

:Parts 1 and 2 in this series of three articles have shown that and how strong evidence-based medicine has neither a coherent theoretical foundation nor creditable application to clinical practice. Because of its core commitment to the discredited positivist tradition it holds both a false concept of scientific knowledge and misunderstandings concerning clinical decision-making. Strong EBM continues attempts to use flawed adjustments to recover from the unsalvageable base view. Paper three argues that a promising solution is at hand if we can manage several modes of inclusion. A modified original, moderate version of EBM continues though usually overshadowed. As definitively laid out by Sackett in the 1990s, clinical decision making is intended to be person-centered, recognizing and integrating multiple modes of evidence and knowledge that have been marginalized: professional experience, illness narratives, and individual patients' values and preferences. Complementary resources are at hand: interpretative understanding and practice, such as philosophical anthropology, hermeneutical phenomenology, complexity theory, and phronetic practices respond to the major problems and open new possibilities. Phronesis is especially important in regard to public decision making. Within part 3 an additional tone necessarily occurs. While most of papers 1, 2, and 3 are written in the classical mode of contrasting the theoretical-logical and empirical evidence offered by contending positions bearing on the decision making and judgement in clinical practice, a shift occurs when considerations move beyond what is possible for clinical practitioners to accomplish. A different, discontinuous level of power operates in the trans-personal realm of instrumental policy, insurance, and hospital management practices. In this social-economic-political-ethical realm what happens in clinical practice today increasingly becomes a matter of what is "done unto" clinical practitioners, of what hampers their professional action and thus care of individual patients and clients.

journal_name

J Eval Clin Pract

journal_title

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice

authors

Mugerauer R

doi

10.1111/jep.13512

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2020-12-04 00:00:00

eissn

1356-1294

issn

1365-2753

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

Professional judgement in clinical practice (part 3): A better alternative to strong evidence-based medicine.