当前位置： SCI文献检索 > OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY期刊下所有文献 > Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review.

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review.

Abstract：

OBJECTIVE:To comprehensively review and critically assess the available gynecologic surgery venous thromboembolism prophylaxis literature and provide clinical practice guidelines. DATA SOURCES:MEDLINE and Cochrane databases from inception to July 2010. We included randomized controlled trials in gynecologic surgery populations. Interventions and comparators included graduated compression stockings, intermittent pneumatic compression, unfractionated heparin, and low molecular weight heparin; placebo and routine postoperative care were allowed as comparators. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION:One thousand two hundred sixty-six articles were screened, and 14 randomized controlled trials (five benign gynecologic, nine gynecologic oncology) met eligibility criteria. In addition, nine prospective or retrospective studies with at least 150 women were identified and provided data on venous thromboembolism risk stratification, gynecologic laparoscopy, and urogynecologic populations. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS:Two reviewers independently screened articles with discrepancies adjudicated by a third. Eligible randomized controlled trials were extracted for these characteristics: study, participant, surgery, intervention, comparator, and outcomes data, including venous thromboembolism incidence and bleeding complications. Studies were individually and collectively assessed for methodologic quality and strength of evidence. Overall incidence of clinical venous thromboembolism was 0-2% in the benign gynecologic population. With use of intermittent pneumatic compression for benign major procedures, venous thromboembolism incidence was less than 1%. No venous thromboembolisms were identified in prospective studies of benign laparoscopic procedures. Overall quality of evidence in the benign gynecologic literature was poor. Gynecologic-oncology randomized controlled trials reported venous thromboembolism incidence (including "silent" venous thromboembolisms) of 0-14.8% with prophylaxis and up to 34.6% without prophylaxis. Fair quality of evidence supports that unfractionated heparin and intermittent pneumatic compression are both superior to placebo or no intervention but insufficient to determine whether heparins are superior to intermittent pneumatic compression for venous thromboembolism prevention. Combining two of three risks (aged 60 years or older, cancer, or personal venous thromboembolism history) substantially elevated the risk of venous thromboembolism. CONCLUSION:Intermittent pneumatic compression provides sufficient prophylaxis for the majority of gynecology patients undergoing benign surgery. Additional risk factors warrant the use of combined mechanical and pharmacologic prophylaxis.

journal_name

Obstet Gynecol

journal_title

Obstetrics and gynecology

authors

Rahn DD,Mamik MM,Sanses TVD,Matteson KA,Aschkenazi SO,Washington BB,Steinberg AC,Harvie HS,Lukban JC,Uhlig K,Balk EM,Sung VW,Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic Review Group.

doi

10.1097/AOG.0b013e318232a394

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2011-11-01 00:00:00

pages

1111-1125

issue

eissn

0029-7844

issn

1873-233X

pii

00006250-201111000-00021

journal_volume

118

pub_type

杂志文章,评审

在线工具

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review.