当前位置： SCI文献检索 > CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH期刊下所有文献 > The Natural History of Osteoarthritis: What Happens to the Other Hip?

The Natural History of Osteoarthritis: What Happens to the Other Hip?

Abstract：

BACKGROUND:Idiopathic osteoarthritis (OA) is a common diagnosis leading to hip arthroplasty. Patients undergoing unilateral hip arthroplasty often wonder whether their other hip will follow the same path as the one that was operated on, and if so, when? There also are limited data available to predict from AP radiographs which contralateral hips will have OA develop and which will not. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES:We sought (1) to determine the incidence of contralateral osteoarthritic degeneration in a group of patients who were treated with unilateral hip arthroplasty; and (2) to identify clinical and radiographic features associated with the development of contralateral OA. METHODS:Between 1998 and 2010, we performed 398 hip arthroplasties on patients with unilateral primary hip OA, who at the time of surgery did not have any symptoms in the contralateral hip. Of those, 367 (92%) had a minimum 2-year radiographic followup (mean, 11 years; range, 2-17 years). The 31 patients dropped from the study for lack of radiographic followup had comparable preoperative features as the study group. We performed a radiographic analysis on the baseline AP radiographs to see what factors were associated with arthritis progression, and we performed Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis with contralateral hip pain and contralateral THA as the endpoints. RESULTS:Kaplan-Meier survival estimates indicated that 10 years after the baseline evaluation, 59% (95% CI, 53%-65%) of the patients remained free of symptoms on the contralateral hip and 81% (95% CI, 75%-85%) remained free of an arthroplasty on the contralateral hip. Sex, age, weight, or BMI were not associated with the development of OA on the contralateral hip with the numbers available. Reduced minimum joint space width (hazard ratio, 0.299; 95% CI, 0.237-0.378), low center-edge angle (hazard ratio, 0.941; 95% CI, 0.915-0.968), low head-to-neck ratio (hazard ratio, 1.555; 95% CI, 1.088-2.223), and the presence of osteophytes (hazard ratio, 1.453; 95% CI, 1.001-2.110) were associated with the development of contralateral OA. In hips with a center-edge angle greater than 25°, a head-to-neck ratio of 1.3 or less increased the chances of development of OA by 86% (hazard ratio, 1.857; 95% CI, 1.235-2.793). CONCLUSIONS:The variables we studied can easily be assessed from an AP pelvis radiograph so physicians can predict the occurrence of contralateral OA and the need for future hip arthroplasty in their patients needing unilateral arthroplasty. However, the data available might have led us to underestimate the need for contralateral arthroplasty. Future studies with a prospective design should aim at completing the list of radiographic features associated with the development of OA by adding a review of lateral radiographs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Level IV, prognostic study.

journal_name

Clin Orthop Relat Res

journal_title

Clinical orthopaedics and related research

authors

Amstutz HC,Le Duff MJ

doi

10.1007/s11999-016-4888-y

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2016-08-01 00:00:00

pages

1802-9

issue

eissn

0009-921X

issn

1528-1132

pii

10.1007/s11999-016-4888-y

journal_volume

474

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

The Natural History of Osteoarthritis: What Happens to the Other Hip?