当前位置： SCI文献检索 > ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY期刊下所有文献 > Allograft materials in phalloplasty: a comparative analysis.

Allograft materials in phalloplasty: a comparative analysis.

Abstract：

INTRODUCTION:Allograft use has increased recently with the rising use of allograft materials in breast surgery. There are few data that compare the performance of the various allograft materials in this application, despite marketing efforts by the manufacturers to present one allograft material as superior to another. Phalloplasty is a procedure that uses allografts for penis girth augmentation. Preparation of these grafts differs with each manufacturer. We report our experience with 3 different types of allografts for this procedure. This allows for the comparison of these materials in their performance with a single model. METHODS:Forty-seven patients who underwent penis girth enhancement with allograft material were reviewed. All patients underwent circumferential grafting to the shaft of the penis at the level of Buck's fascia. Graft materials included AlloDerm (n = 9), Belladerm (n = 20), and Repriza (n = 21). Charts were reviewed for material type, presence and type of infection, wound exposure, and graft loss with attention to the type of allograft material that was used. RESULTS:Follow-up ranged from 1 to 120 months with an average of 11.25 months. Infection, defined as an open wound with graft exposure, occurred in 20 (42%) of 47 patients. Of these, graft exposure only occurred in 17 (36%) patients, whereas 3 (6%) patients sustained total graft loss. Graft exposure or loss occurred in 3 patients who had AlloDerm, 9 patients with Belladerm, and 8 patients with Repriza. No patients with AlloDerm sustained graft loss, whereas 2 patients with Belladerm and 1 patient with Repriza sustained graft loss. There were no statistical differences among these graft types with regard to infection or graft loss. CONCLUSIONS:Three different brands of allograft material were used in 1 surgical procedure and followed up for their performance with regard to exposure and infection. In this model, there is no difference in the rate of infection in these materials despite their different methods of preparation. Implications of this fact are discussed in the approach surgeons should consider when using these materials.

journal_name

Ann Plast Surg

journal_title

Annals of plastic surgery

authors

Solomon MP,Komlo C,Defrain M

doi

10.1097/SAP.0b013e318281aece

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2013-09-01 00:00:00

pages

297-9

issue

eissn

0148-7043

issn

1536-3708

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

Allograft materials in phalloplasty: a comparative analysis.