当前位置： SCI文献检索 > RESUSCITATION期刊下所有文献 > Intracerebroventricular application of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after cardiac arrest does not promote beneficial effects on cerebral recovery after cardiac arrest in rats.

Intracerebroventricular application of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after cardiac arrest does not promote beneficial effects on cerebral recovery after cardiac arrest in rats.

Abstract：

SUBJECT:Recent data demonstrated potent neuroprotective effects of growth hormones such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) after focal cerebral ischaemia. In order to assess possible effects of intracerebroventricular application of G-CSF on cerebral recovery after cardiac arrest (CA) in rats, neurological testing and histological analyses were performed. INTERVENTIONS:After 6 min of electrically induced CA, rats were resuscitated (CPR) and divided into two groups (G-CSF vs. placebo) with two different reperfusion times (7 and 14 days). G-CSF (3.84 microg) or placebo was applied 30 min after restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). At 24h, 3, 7, 10 and 14 days, behavioural neurological testing was done (tape removal test, TRT). Neuronal degeneration of the hippocampal CA-1 sector was analyzed by TUNEL- and Nissl-staining. RESULTS:Before CA all animals passed the TRT (G-CSF 7 [4-12] s, placebo 9 [6-10] s). After ROSC both groups showed a clear neurological deficit (24h: G-CSF and placebo 180 [180-180] s), that improved with ongoing reperfusion times, without reaching baseline values (14 days: G-CSF 25 [21-59] s, placebo 34 [14-175] s). Survival rates did not differ between the groups. All animals showed massive neurodegeneration histologically without any differences between the groups 7 days after CA (TUNEL-positive: G-CSF 63.2 [53.8-72.1], placebo 72.6 [66.6-82.7]; Nissl-positive: G-CSF 2.5 [1.8-3.4], placebo 2.8 [2.0-5.1]). At 14 days, TUNEL-staining revealed no differences (G-CSF 45.2 [35.0-60.0], placebo 56.0 [37.6-63.4]), while G-CSF treatment led to fewer Nissl-positive neurons (G-CSF 1.5 [1.2-2.2], placebo 3.1 [2.1-4.2]; p=0.011). CONCLUSIONS:Despite promising experimental data concerning focal cerebral ischaemia, in this model of 6 min of normothermic CA no beneficial effects of G-CSF application could be demonstrated by behavioural testing and histological analyses of the hippocampal CA-1 sector.

journal_name

Resuscitation

journal_title

Resuscitation

authors

Popp E,Rabsahl T,Schneider A,Russ N,Spöhr F,Vogel P,Böttiger BW,Teschendorf P

doi

10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.01.003

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2009-04-01 00:00:00

pages

478-83

issue

eissn

0300-9572

issn

1873-1570

pii

S0300-9572(09)00011-2

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

Intracerebroventricular application of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after cardiac arrest does not promote beneficial effects on cerebral recovery after cardiac arrest in rats.