当前位置： SCI文献检索 > CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY期刊下所有文献 > Phase-I dose escalation and sequencing study of docetaxel and continuous infusion topotecan in patients with advanced malignancies.

Phase-I dose escalation and sequencing study of docetaxel and continuous infusion topotecan in patients with advanced malignancies.

Abstract：

PURPOSE:Anti-tumor activity can often be enhanced with combination therapy in managing patients with metastatic cancer. However, dose sequence and schedule of delivery can alter the pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and anti-tumor response. Therefore, attention to drug-drug interactions which may be sequence or schedule-dependent are necessary. Docetaxel and topotecan are non-cross-resistance cytotoxic agents with activity in a variety of malignancies. The goal of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of docetaxel and continuous infusion topotecan using two sequences of administration. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Patients were randomized to schedule A or B and enrolled in four escalating-dose cohorts. On schedule A, docetaxel was administered over 1 h and followed by topotecan administered over 72 h. On schedule B, topotecan was given as a 72 h continuous infusion followed by a 1 h infusion of docetaxel. While the doses for the docetaxel and topotecan were the same for schedule A and schedule B, the toxicities, and thus the determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD), were assessed independently. The plasma pharmacokinetic disposition of topotecan and docetaxel were evaluated during the first cycle of each sequence to assess drug interactions. RESULTS:Thirty patients, 20 males and 10 females were evaluable for toxicity and response. Four patients were chemonaive. Mean number cycles given were 3. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were comparable on both schedules, as was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) for both schedules. There were no apparent differences in absolute neutrophil count or platelet nadirs between schedules A and B for three of the four cohorts. The principal non-hematologic toxicity was nausea and vomiting. The time of overlap of topotecan lactone or total concentrations and docetaxel concentrations were greater on schedule A as compared with schedule B and was associated with reduced clearance of docetaxel on schedule A as compared to schedule B. However, the mean clearance for docetaxel (18 for all 16 L h(-1) m(-2) and 29 for all 28 L h(-1) m(-2) on schedules A and B, respectively, and topotecan 16 for all 10 L h(-1) m(-2) and 7 for all 6 L h(-1) m(-2) on schedules A and B, respectively) were not statistically different (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:The observed toxicity was not sequence-dependent, despite the observed change in kinetics. Docetaxel and topotecan can be administered with acceptable toxicity at the recommended phase-II dose of docetaxel 60 mg m(-2) and topotecan 0.85 mg m(-2) day(-1)x3 days.

journal_name

Cancer Chemother Pharmacol

journal_title

Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology

authors

Posey JA,Wang H,Hamilton J,Delgrosso A,Zhang R,Freda T,Zamboni WC

doi

10.1007/s00280-004-0925-8

keywords:

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2005-08-01 00:00:00

pages

182-8

issue

eissn

0344-5704

issn

1432-0843

journal_volume

pub_type

临床试验,杂志文章,随机对照试验

在线工具

Phase-I dose escalation and sequencing study of docetaxel and continuous infusion topotecan in patients with advanced malignancies.