当前位置： SCI文献检索 > Implementation Science期刊下所有文献 > Research evidence and policy: qualitative study in selected provinces in South Africa and Cameroon.

Research evidence and policy: qualitative study in selected provinces in South Africa and Cameroon.

Abstract：

BACKGROUND:The translation of research into policy and practice is enhanced by policymakers who can recognise and articulate their information needs and researchers that understand the policymakers' environment. As researchers, we sought to understand the policymaking process and how research evidence may contribute in South Africa and Cameroon. METHODS:We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews in South Africa and focus group discussions in Cameroon with purposively sampled subnational (provincial and regional) government health programme managers. Audio recorded interviews were transcribed, thematically coded and analysed. RESULTS:Participants in both countries described the complex, often lengthy nature of policymaking processes, which often include back-and-forth consultations with many diverse stakeholder groups. These processes may be influenced by political structures, relationships between national and subnational levels, funding and international stakeholder agendas. Research is not a main driver of policy, but rather current contextual realities, costs, logistics and people (clinicians, NGOs, funders) influence the policy, and research plays a part. Research evidence is frequently perceived as unavailable, inaccessible, ill-timed or not applicable. The reliability of research on the internet was questioned. Evidence-informed health decision-making (EIDM) is regarded as necessary in South Africa but is less well understood in Cameroon. Insufficient time and capacity were hindrances to EIDM in both countries. Good relationships between researchers and policymakers may facilitate EIDM. Researchers should have a good understanding of the policymaking environment if they want to influence it. Greater interaction between policymakers and researchers is perceived as beneficial when formulating research and policy questions as it raises researchers' awareness of implementation challenges and enables the design of tailored and focused strategies to respond to policymakers' needs. CONCLUSIONS:Policymaking is complicated, lengthy and mostly done at national level. Provinces/regions are tasked with implementation, with more room for adaptation in South Africa than in Cameroon. Research evidence plays a role in policy but does not drive it and is seen as mostly unavailable. Researchers need a thorough understanding of the policy process and environment, how the health system operates, as well as the priorities of policymakers. This can inform effective dialogue between researchers and policymakers, and contribute to enhancing use of research evidence in decision-making.

journal_name

Implement Sci

journal_title

Implementation science : IS

authors

Naude CE,Zani B,Ongolo-Zogo P,Wiysonge CS,Dudley L,Kredo T,Garner P,Young T

doi

10.1186/s13012-015-0315-0

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2015-09-03 00:00:00

pages

126

issn

1748-5908

pii

10.1186/s13012-015-0315-0

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

Research evidence and policy: qualitative study in selected provinces in South Africa and Cameroon.