当前位置： SCI文献检索 > Implementation Science期刊下所有文献 > The feasibility of implementing recovery, psychosocial and pharmacological interventions for psychosis: comparison study.

The feasibility of implementing recovery, psychosocial and pharmacological interventions for psychosis: comparison study.

Abstract：

BACKGROUND:Clinical guidelines for the treatment of people experiencing psychosis have existed for over a decade, but implementation of recommended interventions is limited. Identifying influences on implementation may help to reduce this translational gap. The Structured Assessment of Feasibility (SAFE) measure is a standardised assessment of implementation blocks and enablers. The aim of this study was to characterise and compare the implementation blocks and enablers for recommended psychosis interventions. METHODS:SAFE was used to evaluate and compare three groups of interventions recommended in the 2014 NICE psychosis guideline: pharmacological (43 trials testing 5 interventions), psychosocial (65 trials testing 5 interventions), and recovery (19 trials testing 5 interventions). The 127 trial reports rated with SAFE were supplemented by published intervention manuals, research protocols, trial registrations and design papers. Differences in the number of blocks and enablers across the three interventions were tested statistically, and feasibility profiles were generated. RESULTS:There was no difference between psychosocial and recovery interventions in the number of blocks or enablers to implementation. Pharmacological interventions (a) had fewer blocks than both psychosocial interventions (χ (2)(3) = 133.77, p < 0.001) and recovery interventions (χ (2)(3) = 104.67, p < 0.001) and (b) did not differ in number of enablers from recovery interventions (χ (2)(3) = 0.74, p = 0.863) but had fewer enablers than psychosocial interventions (χ (2)(3) = 28.92, p < 0.001). Potential adverse events associated with the intervention tend to be a block for pharmacological interventions, whereas complexity of the intervention was the most consistent block for recovery and psychosocial interventions. CONCLUSIONS:Feasibility profiles show that pharmacological interventions are relatively easy to implement but can sometimes involve risks. Psychosocial and recovery interventions are relatively complex but tend to be more flexible and more often manualised. SAFE ratings can contribute to tackling the current implementation challenges in mental health services, by providing a reporting guideline structure for researchers to maximise the potential for implementation and by informing prioritisation decisions by clinical guideline developers and service managers.

journal_name

Implement Sci

journal_title

Implementation science : IS

authors

van der Krieke L,Bird V,Leamy M,Bacon F,Dunn R,Pesola F,Janosik M,Le Boutillier C,Williams J,Slade M

doi

10.1186/s13012-015-0262-9

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2015-05-23 00:00:00

pages

issn

1748-5908

pii

10.1186/s13012-015-0262-9

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

The feasibility of implementing recovery, psychosocial and pharmacological interventions for psychosis: comparison study.