当前位置： SCI文献检索 > BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making期刊下所有文献 > The validity of synthetic clinical data: a validation study of a leading synthetic data generator (Synthea) using clinical quality measures.

The validity of synthetic clinical data: a validation study of a leading synthetic data generator (Synthea) using clinical quality measures.

Abstract：

BACKGROUND:Clinical data synthesis aims at generating realistic data for healthcare research, system implementation and training. It protects patient confidentiality, deepens our understanding of the complexity in healthcare, and is a promising tool for situations where real world data is difficult to obtain or unnecessary. However, its validity has not been fully examined, and no previous study has validated it from the perspective of healthcare quality, a critical aspect of a healthcare system. This study fills this gap by calculating clinical quality measures using synthetic data. METHODS:We examined an open-source well-documented synthetic data generator Synthea, which was composed of the key advancements in this emerging technique. We selected a representative 1.2-million Massachusetts patient cohort generated by Synthea. Four quality measures, Colorectal Cancer Screening, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) 30-Day Mortality, Rate of Complications after Hip/Knee Replacement, and Controlling High Blood Pressure, were selected based on clinical significance. Calculated rates were then compared with publicly reported rates based on real-world data of Massachusetts and United States. RESULTS:Of the total Synthea Massachusetts population (n = 1,193,439), 394,476 were eligible for the "colorectal cancer screening" quality measure, and 248,433 (63%) were considered compliant, compared to the publicly reported Massachusetts and national rates being 77.3 and 69.8%, respectively. Of the 409 eligible patients, 0.7% of died within 30 days after COPD exacerbation, versus 7% reported in Massachusetts and 8% nationally. Using an expanded logic, this rate increased to 5.7%. No Synthea residents had complications after Hip/Knee Replacement (Massachusetts: 2.9%, national: 2.8%) or had their blood pressure controlled after being diagnosed with hypertension (Massachusetts: 74.52%, national: 69.7%). Results show that Synthea is quite reliable in modeling demographics and probabilities of services being offered in an average healthcare setting. However, its capabilities to model heterogeneous health outcomes post services are limited. CONCLUSIONS:Synthea and other synthetic patient generators do not currently model for deviations in care and the potential outcomes that may result from care deviations. To output a more realistic data set, we propose that synthetic data generators should consider important quality measures in their logic and model when clinicians may deviate from standard practice.

journal_name

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak

journal_title

BMC medical informatics and decision making

authors

Chen J,Chun D,Patel M,Chiang E,James J

doi

10.1186/s12911-019-0793-0

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2019-03-14 00:00:00

pages

issue

issn

1472-6947

pii

10.1186/s12911-019-0793-0

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

The validity of synthetic clinical data: a validation study of a leading synthetic data generator (Synthea) using clinical quality measures.