当前位置： SCI文献检索 > BMC Family Practice期刊下所有文献 > A focus group study to understand biases and confounders in a cluster randomized controlled trial on low back pain in primary care in Norway.

A focus group study to understand biases and confounders in a cluster randomized controlled trial on low back pain in primary care in Norway.

Abstract：

BACKGROUND:Cluster randomized controlled trials are often used in research in primary care but creates challenges regarding biases and confounders. We recently presented a study on low back pain from primary care in Norway with equal effects in the intervention and the control group. In order to understand the specific mechanisms that may produce biases in a cluster randomized trial we conducted a focus group study among the participating health care providers. The aim of this study was to understand how the participating providers themselves influenced on the study and thereby possibly on the results of the cluster randomized controlled trial. METHODS:The providers were invited to share their experiences from their participation in the COPE study, from recruitment of patients to accomplishment of either the intervention or control consultations. Six clinicians from the intervention group and four from the control group took part in the focus group interviews. The group discussions focused on feasibility of the study in primary care and particularly on identifying potential biases and confounders in the study. The audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed according to a systematic text condensation. The themes for the analysis emerged from the group discussions. RESULTS:A personal interest for back pain, logistic factors at the clinics and an assessment of the patients' capacity to accomplish the study prior to their recruitment was reported. The providers were allowed to provide additional therapy to the intervention and it turned out that some of these could be regarded as opposed to the messages of the intervention. The providers seemed to select different items from the educational package according to personal beliefs and their perception of the patients' acceptance. CONCLUSION:The study disclosed several potential biases to the COPE study which may have impacted on the study results. Awareness of these is highly important when planning and conducting a cluster randomized controlled trial. Procedures in the recruitment of both providers and patients seem to be key factors and the providers should be aware of their role in a scientific study in order to standardize the provision of the intervention.

journal_name

BMC Fam Pract

journal_title

BMC family practice

authors

Werner EL,Løchting I,Storheim K,Grotle M

doi

10.1186/s12875-018-0759-9

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2018-05-22 00:00:00

pages

issue

issn

1471-2296

pii

10.1186/s12875-018-0759-9

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章,随机对照试验

在线工具

A focus group study to understand biases and confounders in a cluster randomized controlled trial on low back pain in primary care in Norway.