当前位置： SCI文献检索 > BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS期刊下所有文献 > Surgery versus conservative treatment in patients with type A distal radius fractures, a randomized controlled trial.

Surgery versus conservative treatment in patients with type A distal radius fractures, a randomized controlled trial.

Abstract：

BACKGROUND:Fractures of the distal radius are common and account for an estimated 17% of all fractures diagnosed. Two-thirds of these fractures are displaced and require reduction. Although distal radius fractures, especially extra-articular fractures, are considered to be relatively harmless, inadequate treatment may result in impaired function of the wrist. Initial treatment according to Dutch guidelines consists of closed reduction and plaster immobilisation. If fracture redisplacement occurs, surgical treatment is recommended. Recently, the use of volar locking plates has become more popular. The aim of this study is to compare the functional outcome following surgical reduction and fixation with a volar locking plate with the functional outcome following closed reduction and plaster immobilisation in patients with displaced extra-articular distal radius fractures. DESIGN:This single blinded randomised controlled trial will randomise between open reduction and internal fixation with a volar locking plate (intervention group) and closed reduction followed by plaster immobilisation (control group). The study population will consist of all consecutive adult patients who are diagnosed with a displaced extra-articular distal radius fracture, which has been adequately reduced at the Emergency Department. The primary outcome (functional outcome) will be assessed by means of the Disability Arm Shoulder Hand Score (DASH). Secondary outcomes comprise the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score (PRWE), quality of life, pain, range of motion, radiological parameters, complications and cross-overs. Since the treatment allocated involves a surgical procedure, randomisation status will not be blinded. However, the researcher assessing the outcome at one year will be unaware of the treatment allocation. In total, 90 patients will be included and this trial will require an estimated time of two years to complete and will be conducted in the Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam and its partners of the regional trauma care network. DICUSSION:Ideally, patients would be randomised before any kind of treatment has been commenced. However, we deem it not patient-friendly to approach possible participants before adequate reduction has been obtained. TRIAL REGISTRATION:This study is registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR3113) and was granted permission by the Medical Ethical Review Committee of the Academic Medical Centre on 01-10-2012.

journal_name

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

journal_title

BMC musculoskeletal disorders

authors

Walenkamp MM,Goslings JC,Beumer A,Haverlag R,Leenhouts PA,Verleisdonk EJ,Liem RS,Sintenie JB,Bronkhorst MW,Winkelhagen J,Schep NW

doi

10.1186/1471-2474-15-90

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2014-03-19 00:00:00

pages

issn

1471-2474

pii

1471-2474-15-90

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章,随机对照试验

在线工具

Surgery versus conservative treatment in patients with type A distal radius fractures, a randomized controlled trial.