当前位置： SCI文献检索 > BMC BIOINFORMATICS期刊下所有文献 > Extending the evaluation of Genia Event task toward knowledge base construction and comparison to Gene Regulation Ontology task.

Extending the evaluation of Genia Event task toward knowledge base construction and comparison to Gene Regulation Ontology task.

Abstract：

BACKGROUND:The third edition of the BioNLP Shared Task was held with the grand theme "knowledge base construction (KB)". The Genia Event (GE) task was re-designed and implemented in light of this theme. For its final report, the participating systems were evaluated from a perspective of annotation. To further explore the grand theme, we extended the evaluation from a perspective of KB construction. Also, the Gene Regulation Ontology (GRO) task was newly introduced in the third edition. The final evaluation of the participating systems resulted in relatively low performance. The reason was attributed to the large size and complex semantic representation of the ontology. To investigate potential benefits of resource exchange between the presumably similar tasks, we measured the overlap between the datasets of the two tasks, and tested whether the dataset for one task can be used to enhance performance on the other. RESULTS:We report an extended evaluation on all the participating systems in the GE task, incoporating a KB perspective. For the evaluation, the final submission of each participant was converted to RDF statements, and evaluated using 8 queries that were formulated in SPARQL. The results suggest that the evaluation may be concluded differently between the two different perspectives, annotation vs. KB. We also provide a comparison of the GE and GRO tasks by converting their datasets into each other's format. More than 90% of the GE data could be converted into the GRO task format, while only half of the GRO data could be mapped to the GE task format. The imbalance in conversion indicates that the GRO is a comprehensive extension of the GE task ontology. We further used the converted GRO data as additional training data for the GE task, which helped improve GE task participant system performance. However, the converted GE data did not help GRO task participants, due to overfitting and the ontology gap.

journal_name

BMC Bioinformatics

journal_title

BMC bioinformatics

authors

Kim JD,Kim JJ,Han X,Rebholz-Schuhmann D

doi

10.1186/1471-2105-16-S10-S3

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2015-01-01 00:00:00

pages

issn

1471-2105

pii

1471-2105-16-S10-S3

journal_volume

16 Suppl 10

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

Extending the evaluation of Genia Event task toward knowledge base construction and comparison to Gene Regulation Ontology task.