Abstract:
:The opposition between psychoanalysis and systematic interdisciplinary research is to be regretted. The target article attempts to bridge the intellectual divide and for this aim as well as the intellectual adroitness shown it is to be celebrated. Much harder to understand is the high level of affect generated by the debate. Accusations of "doublethink" are helpful. The present paper, like the target paper it follows, attempts to develop an understanding of the position of those who are categorically opposed to interdisciplinary systematic research linked to psychoanalysis. Appreciating the perspective of those deeply opposed to such work could help to create a shared agenda from which our troubled discipline could benefit. This is predicated on the possibility of an open collegial dialogue which this journal was founded to create.
journal_name
Psychoanal Dialoguesjournal_title
Psychoanalytic dialoguesauthors
Fonagy Pdoi
10.1080/10481885.2013.754276subject
Has Abstractpub_date
2013-01-01 00:00:00pages
116-122issue
1eissn
1048-1885issn
1940-9222journal_volume
23pub_type
杂志文章