当前位置： SCI文献检索 > Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes期刊下所有文献 > Using internally developed risk models to assess heterogeneity in treatment effects in clinical trials.

Using internally developed risk models to assess heterogeneity in treatment effects in clinical trials.

Abstract：

BACKGROUND:Recent proposals suggest that risk-stratified analyses of clinical trials be routinely performed to better enable tailoring of treatment decisions to individuals. Trial data can be stratified using externally developed risk models (eg, Framingham risk score), but such models are not always available. We sought to determine whether internally developed risk models, developed directly on trial data, introduce bias compared with external models. METHODS AND RESULTS:We simulated a large patient population with known risk factors and outcomes. Clinical trials were then simulated by repeatedly drawing from the patient population assuming a specified relative treatment effect in the experimental arm, which either did or did not vary according to a subject's baseline risk. For each simulated trial, 2 internal risk models were developed on either the control population only (internal controls only) or the whole trial population blinded to treatment (internal whole trial). Bias was estimated for the internal models by comparing treatment effect predictions to predictions from the external model. Under all treatment assumptions, internal models introduced only modest bias compared with external models. The magnitude of these biases was slightly smaller for internal whole trial models than for internal controls only models. Internal whole trial models were also slightly less sensitive to bias introduced by overfitting and less sensitive to falsely identifying the existence of variability in treatment effect across the risk spectrum compared with internal controls only models. CONCLUSIONS:Appropriately developed internal models produce relatively unbiased estimates of treatment effect across the spectrum of risk. When estimating treatment effect, internally developed risk models using both treatment arms should, in general, be preferred to models developed on the control population.

journal_name

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes

journal_title

Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes

authors

Burke JF,Hayward RA,Nelson JP,Kent DM

doi

10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000497

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2014-01-01 00:00:00

pages

163-9

issue

eissn

1941-7713

issn

1941-7705

pii

CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000497

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

Using internally developed risk models to assess heterogeneity in treatment effects in clinical trials.