当前位置： SCI文献检索 > EUROPEAN UROLOGY期刊下所有文献 > Robot-assisted Cavectomy Versus Thrombectomy for Level II Inferior Vena Cava Thrombus: Decision-making Scheme and Multi-institutional Analysis.

Robot-assisted Cavectomy Versus Thrombectomy for Level II Inferior Vena Cava Thrombus: Decision-making Scheme and Multi-institutional Analysis.

Abstract：

BACKGROUND:Robot-assisted thrombectomy (RAT) for inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus (RAT-IVCT) is being increasingly reported. However, the techniques and indications for robot-assisted cavectomy (RAC) for IVC thrombus are not well described. OBJECTIVE:To develop a decision-making program and analyze multi-institutional outcomes of RAC-IVCT versus RAT-IVCT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:Ninety patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with level II IVCT were included from eight Chinese urological centers, and underwent RAC-IVCT (30 patients) or RAT-IVCT (60 patients) from June 2013 to January 2019. SURGICAL PROCEDURE:The surgical strategy was based on IVCT imaging characteristics. RAT-IVCT was performed with standardized cavotomy, thrombectomy, and IVC reconstruction. RAC-IVCT was mainly performed in patients with extensive IVC wall invasion when the collateral blood vessels were well-established. For right-sided RCC, the IVC from the infrarenal vein to the infrahepatic veins was stapled. For left-sided RCC, the IVC from the suprarenal vein to the infrahepatic veins was removed and caudal IVC reconstruction was performed to ensure the right renal vein returned through the IVC collaterals. MEASUREMENTS:Clinicopathological, operative, and survival outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS:All procedures were successfully performed without open conversion. The median operation time (268 vs 190 min) and estimated blood loss (1500 vs 400 ml) were significantly greater for RAC-IVCT versus RAT-IVCT (both p < 0.001). IVC invasion was a risk factor for progression-free and overall survival at midterm follow-up. Large-volume and long-term follow-up studies are needed. CONCLUSIONS:RAC-IVCT or RAT-IVCT represents an alternative minimally invasive approach for selected RCC patients with level II IVCT. Selection of RAC-IVCT or RAT-IVCT is mainly based on preoperative IVCT imaging characteristics, including the presence of IVC wall invasion, the affected kidney, and establishment of the collateral circulation. PATIENT SUMMARY:In this study we found that robotic surgeries for level II inferior vena cava thrombus were feasible and safe. Preoperative imaging played an important role in establishing an appropriate surgical plan.

journal_name

Eur Urol

journal_title

European urology

authors

Shi T,Huang Q,Liu K,Du S,Fan Y,Yang L,Peng C,Shen D,Wang Z,Gao Y,Gu L,Niu S,Ai Q,Li H,Liu F,Li Q,Wang H,Guo A,Fu B,Yang X,Zhang X,Wang D,Wang D,Guo H,Li H,Olivero A,Fam XI,Ma X,Wang B,Zhang X

doi

10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.020

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2020-10-01 00:00:00

pages

592-602

issue

eissn

0302-2838

issn

1873-7560

pii

S0302-2838(20)30195-0

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

Robot-assisted Cavectomy Versus Thrombectomy for Level II Inferior Vena Cava Thrombus: Decision-making Scheme and Multi-institutional Analysis.