当前位置： SCI文献检索 > MEDICINE期刊下所有文献 > Meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing the efficacy and safety of liposomal cisplatin versus conventional nonliposomal cisplatin in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

Meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing the efficacy and safety of liposomal cisplatin versus conventional nonliposomal cisplatin in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

Abstract：

BACKGROUND:While liposomal cisplatin has shown enhanced drug tolerability and higher targeting property as compared with the conventional cisplatin, the doubt remains whether lipoplatin could improve its anticancer efficacy. What's more, there is still no systematic evaluation of the safety profiles of lipoplatin comparing with original cisplatin. Thus, we performed a systematic literature search for randomized clinical trials directly comparing efficacy and safety of liposomal cisplatin versus its conventional nonliposomal cisplatin. METHODS:The electronic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to February 10, 2018. The pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of progressive disease (PD), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and adverse events (AEs) were obtained to assess the efficacy and safety. Heterogeneity was estimated using the I test (I > 50%, significant heterogeneity). RESULTS:The search yielded 5 clinical trials that meet inclusion criteria, with a total of 523 patients. We found that the liposome encapsulated cisplatin was more clinical efficacious than cisplatin as assessed by PD rate (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28-0.74; P = .002), while subgroup analysis of the only nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients showed higher response rates in PR (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28-0.74; P = .002) and PD (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28-0.74; P = .002) simultaneously. In addition, the toxicity meta-analysis revealed lipoplatin was much less toxic than the original cisplatin, with respect to grade 3 to 4 neurotoxicity (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.74; P = .02), grade 3 to 4 leukopenia (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.26-0.85; P = .01), grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09-0.71; P = .009), grade 1 and 2 nausea/vomiting (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.32-0.77; P = .002), and grade 3 and 4 asthenia (OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.03-0.42; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS:This meta-analysis revealed that with both NSCLC and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) patients, liposomal cisplatin-based chemotherapy offers significant advantages regarding the PD and reduced toxicities relative to conventional cisplatin.

journal_name

Medicine (Baltimore)

journal_title

Medicine

authors

Xu B,Zeng M,Zeng J,Feng J,Yu L

doi

10.1097/MD.0000000000013169

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2018-11-01 00:00:00

pages

e13169

issue

eissn

0025-7974

issn

1536-5964

pii

00005792-201811160-00032

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章,meta分析

在线工具

Meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing the efficacy and safety of liposomal cisplatin versus conventional nonliposomal cisplatin in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).