Abstract:
:The QT interval is correlated with heart rate; therefore, the QT interval is usually corrected by heart rate when drug-induced QT effect is studied. Currently, there are many correction methods that use either fixed or data-driven approaches. The effectiveness of correction methods depends on many factors and varies from study to study. Statistical validation and comparisons need to be performed to determine the most appropriate correction method for each study. We examined different validation methods and explored a new approach to use when the testing drug changes heart rate.
journal_name
Ther Innov Regul Scijournal_title
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory scienceauthors
Dang Q,Zhang Jdoi
10.1177/2168479012467018subject
Has Abstractpub_date
2013-03-01 00:00:00pages
256-260issue
2eissn
2168-4790issn
2168-4804journal_volume
47pub_type
杂志文章abstract:BACKGROUND:Safety data are continuously evaluated throughout the life cycle of a medical product to accurately assess and characterize the risks associated with the product. The knowledge about a medical product's safety profile continually evolves as safety data accumulate. METHODS:This paper discusses data sources a...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章,评审
doi:10.1177/2168479017741112
更新日期:2018-03-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Package leaflets of medicines distributed within the European Union should use the template headings and standard texts created by the Working Group on the Quality Review of Documents (QRD). The following study investigated how the QRD template is implemented in this patient information. METHODS:All English...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479015620247
更新日期:2016-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::Efficient use of limited pharmaceutical product development resources requires integrating multiple attributes, such as efficacy, safety, pharmacology, and so on, to decide at any stage whether the development of a product should proceed aggressively or slowly or be terminated. The decision process proceeds most effec...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479014558273
更新日期:2015-03-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Communicating the clinical impact of immunogenicity in labeling is important for safe and effective use of certain prescription products. Current U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance does not provide comprehensive recommendations on the communication of clinical impact of immunogenicity in labeli...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00161-z
更新日期:2020-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::A universal framework for the evaluation of the benefit-risk assessment of medicines during development by pharmaceutical companies and in the regulatory review by regulatory authorities is considered of value, as it would result in the systematic structured approach to support transparency in decision making. Several...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479014547421
更新日期:2015-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::When registering food supplements in Russia, restrictions on the labeling and consumer leaflet contents are tightly controlled by the regulatory agencies. Thus, misleading advertising is the most difficult problem with the turnover of these products if information in the commercials does not correspond to the informat...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章,评审
doi:10.1007/s43441-019-00043-z
更新日期:2020-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::The American Statistical Association and DIA have created an interdisciplinary working group of drug safety experts from academia, industry and regulatory backgrounds to explore the future direction for safety monitoring. This introduction to the series explains the background and rationale for this special section. ...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479018793130
更新日期:2019-03-29 00:00:00
abstract::Source data verification (SDV) is the process of confirming that reliable, accurate information collected from participants during a clinical trial has been reported successfully to the trial's sponsor by investigators conducting the study. Over the past 15 years or so, there has been considerable discussion in the li...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479013496245
更新日期:2014-03-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Substance abuse research can raise ethical concerns about the comprehension and decision-making capacities of participants with drug dependence. In this study, the competence and willingness to consent to research participation were examined among patients with heroin dependence. METHODS:Twenty patients wit...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00127-1
更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::Recently, it is becoming increasingly difficult to develop innovative drugs. Thus, the role of regulatory science research in drug development and postmarketing settings has become more important. In this article, the authors discuss the roles of regulatory science research at the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices A...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479012469950
更新日期:2013-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::The volume and diversity of data collected to support each clinical study has increased dramatically in response to the rising scope and complexity of global drug development programs. The Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development conducted an online survey of 257 unique global companies-77% drug development spon...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479018769292
更新日期:2019-01-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:The influence of patient advocates on FDA regulatory decision making has increased. Despite enhanced engagement with FDA, there remain challenges to achieving the regulatory goals of patients within FDA's regulatory framework. Gaps exist between patient advocates' knowledge of the agency's processes and FDA'...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479017753390
更新日期:2018-09-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Access and use of historical control data was identified as a top stakeholder concern across organizations according to results of a survey of needs and challenges related to nonclinical data conducted by the FDA/PhUSE Nonclinical Working Group in 2011. There is a perception there may be additional ways to c...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479015600203
更新日期:2016-03-01 00:00:00
abstract::In general, similar to FDA and other health authorities, the PMDA requires clinical efficacy study(ies) to evaluate equivalence between a reference biological product and a Biosimilar product for new drug applications. Even if an identical clinical efficacy study is included in both of PMDA and FDA submissions, the co...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00133-3
更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Pediatric regulations enacted in both Europe and the USA have disrupted the pharmaceutical industry, challenging business and drug development processes, and organizational structures. Over the last decade, with science and innovation evolving, industry has moved from a reactive to a proactive mode, investin...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00116-4
更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::Confirmation of efficacy in pediatric drug development has traditionally required large, fully powered efficacy studies that have proven to have major feasibility and ethical challenges. Extrapolation of efficacy in the framework provided by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency is an appro...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479013500286
更新日期:2013-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::Adaptive designs are increasingly used in clinical trials. The Drug Information Association's Adaptive Design Scientific Working Group (ADSWG) works to foster collaboration among regulatory agencies, academia, and pharmaceutical and biotech companies to further the science of adaptive clinical development. The ADSWG S...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479014522468
更新日期:2014-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::Expanded access is a regulatory mechanism by which an investigational drug can be made available outside of a clinical trial to treat patients with serious or life-threatening conditions for which there are no satisfactory treatment options. An expanded access program (EAP) is the formal plan under which preapproval a...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479015578154
更新日期:2015-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::Biopharmaceutical medicines are complex molecules obtained from a living organism (plant or animal cells) and may contain components of a living organism using biotechnology. Biosimilars are closely similar to already approved biopharmaceutical products that could form a new generation of medicines that are available ...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章,评审
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00112-8
更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:The number of original and supplemental ANDAs, BLAs, NDAs, and Biosimilars FDA drug/biologic approvals (Approvals) has risen dramatically in the recent years, incidentally, so has the number of issued FDA guidances (Guidances). It is hypothesized that if the structures of the two timeseries are similar and/o...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00123-5
更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::The Asia Pacific (AP) region is diverse and dynamic. It comprises over 40 economies, with about 24 markets that are relatively more active in terms of promulgating and implementing regulations that impact the biopharmaceutical industry and advance drug development. Although many country- and territory-specific regulat...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479018791539
更新日期:2019-07-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Contending with a continuously expanding volume and variety of clinical data poses challenges and opportunities for the industry and clinical data management organizations. METHODS:Tufts CSDD conducted an online survey aimed at further quantifying and understanding the magnitude and impact that expanded dat...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00213-4
更新日期:2020-09-14 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:A data monitoring committee (DMC) has special responsibilities for protecting the safety of clinical trial participants. Few guidance documents are available that address the operations and mechanics of establishing, serving on, or reporting to a DMC. This article provides a practical guide to sponsors, inst...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479016646812
更新日期:2016-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::In March 2017, the US FDA introduced the new Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (RMAT) designation thus recognizing the enormous potential of these medicines and the need for efficient regulatory tools to accelerate their development and their commercial availability. The development of regenerative medicines is v...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479018779373
更新日期:2019-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::Social media presents new challenges to the biopharmaceutical industry for conducting pharmacovigilance activities. The authors reviewed worldwide regulatory guidance documents related to monitoring of adverse events posted on social media sites and identified gaps in current regulatory definitions for pharmacovigilan...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479015587362
更新日期:2015-11-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:(1) To assess the differing viewpoints of actual and potential adult clinical trial participants in 5 age cohorts, (2) identify misperceptions and opportunities to reduce unnecessary burdens on volunteers, and (3) provide age-specific feedback to study sponsors on their current engagement efforts. METHODS:B...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-019-00033-1
更新日期:2020-01-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Several articles showed that statistical efficiency of multi-arm randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is much better than conventional two-arm RCTs. Multi-arm RCTs attract interest mainly when the experimental treatment regimen is not optimized or several pipelines under development exist. Breast cancer is a po...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00141-3
更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::The Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 gave the FDA the authority to require drug sponsors to submit a risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS) program for those medicines with serious risks such that failure to effectively manage these risks would tip the benefit-risk balance. As of August 8,...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479014527749
更新日期:2014-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::The purpose of the present review is to summarize the current pediatric regulatory requirements and also the regulatory efforts that need to be taken for the potential benefits of safety and efficacy to the pediatric patients. The importance of pediatric regulations came into existence as adult physiological condition...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章,评审
doi:10.1007/s43441-019-00087-1
更新日期:2020-05-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Approval of regulated medical products in the USA is based upon a rigorous review of the benefits and risks as performed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) staff of scientists and is summarized in a descriptive and qualitative format called the FDA's Benefit-Risk Framework (BRF). This present metho...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00197-1
更新日期:2021-01-01 00:00:00