Abstract:
AIM:Details of data quality and how quality issues were solved have not been reported in published comparative effectiveness studies using electronic health record data. METHODS:We developed a conceptual framework of data quality assessment and preprocessing and apply it to a study comparing angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors with angiotensin receptor blockerss on renal function decline in diabetes patients. RESULTS:The framework establishes a line of thought to identify and act on data issues. The core concept is to evaluate whether data are fit-for-use for research tasks. Possible quality problems are listed through specific signal detections, and verified whether they are true problems. Optimal solutions are selected for the identified problems. CONCLUSION:This framework can be used in observational studies to improve validity of results.
journal_name
J Comp Eff Resjournal_title
Journal of comparative effectiveness researchauthors
Huang Y,Voorham J,Haaijer-Ruskamp FMdoi
10.2217/cer-2015-0022subject
Has Abstractpub_date
2016-07-01 00:00:00pages
345-54issue
4eissn
2042-6305issn
2042-6313journal_volume
5pub_type
杂志文章abstract:AIMS:This study aimed to identify methods to engage hard-to-reach patients in the research process. MATERIALS & METHODS:With funding from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (Washington, DC, USA), the University of Maryland (MD, USA) conducted 20 focus groups and one individual interview. The sample consi...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer.13.11
更新日期:2013-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::Aim: To evaluate the patterns of cancer patients-assessed quality of outpatient care in the USA. Materials & methods: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey datasets for the years 2011, 2013, 2015 and 2017 were accessed and adult participants with a history of cancer diagnosis were reviewed. Participants' assessments of dif...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2020-0124
更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:Develop an accessible exercise to engage underserved populations about research funding priorities; analyze the criteria they use to prioritize research; contrast these criteria to those currently used by Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). MATERIALS & METHODS:Academic and community partners coll...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2017-0008
更新日期:2017-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::Rationale, aim & objective: The goal of this study was to examine the health and economic impacts related to increased utilization of the Duke Smoking Cessation Program resulting from the addition of two relatively new referral methods - Best Practice Advisory and Population Outreach. Materials & methods: In a compani...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2020-0005
更新日期:2020-08-01 00:00:00
abstract::Alternative approaches to the current rebate system are being considered by policymakers and stakeholders in the private insurance market. This paper presents an analysis of three alternative options to the current rebate model: retaining retroactive rebates but requiring 100% pass-through of rebates and fees to plan ...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2019-0094
更新日期:2019-10-01 00:00:00
abstract::As the Senior Editors of the Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research (JCER) we are delighted to present you with the first issue of this exciting new publication, focusing on the socially and clinically impactful field of comparative effectiveness research (CER). ...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type:
doi:10.2217/cer.11.13
更新日期:2012-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::There is increasing attention in the US healthcare system on the delivery of high-quality care, an issue central to oncology. In the report 'Crossing the Quality Chasm', the Institute of Medicine identified six aims for improving healthcare quality: safe, effective, patient-centered, timely, efficient and equitable. T...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2015-0021
更新日期:2016-05-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of oral and intravenous applications of tranexamic acid (TXA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA). MATERIALS & METHODS:Electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, ScienceDirect and Embase, were searched to identify the studies comparing the ...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章,meta分析
doi:10.2217/cer-2018-0120
更新日期:2019-04-01 00:00:00
abstract::Comparative effectiveness research (CER) calls for substantial changes in the way clinical research is conducted, interpreted and practically applied in the USA, in order to produce useful clinical evidence. Departing from classic efficacy and effectiveness research, the evolving CER paradigm requires structural and s...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章,评审
doi:10.2217/CER.12.23
更新日期:2012-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::Choice-based conjoint (CBC) is used to understand how individuals develop preferences for decision alternatives. When decision alternatives can be described in terms of attributes, researchers want to determine the value respondents attach to various attribute levels. Popular in psychology, marketing, economics and ot...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2019-0115
更新日期:2020-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::Aim: To compare secukinumab with infliximab in biologic-naive patients with psoriatic arthritis using matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Patients & methods: Individual patient baseline data for secukinumab were matched to published aggregate data for infliximab by key baseline characteristics, with matching weight...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2018-0141
更新日期:2019-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::Translation of medical evidence into practice has not kept pace with the growth of medical technology and knowledge. We present three case studies--statins, drug eluting stents and bone marrow transplantation for breast cancer--to propose a framework for describing five factors that may influence the rate of adoption....
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer.13.39
更新日期:2013-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::Aim: Increasing use of selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in Scotland, coupled with safety concerns with some SSRIs, and the increasing availability of generic SSRIs, have resulted in multiple initiatives to improve the quality and efficiency of their prescribing in Scotland. Our aim is to assess their in...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2018-0132
更新日期:2019-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::Aim: To perform cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and budget impact analysis (BIA) comparing stenting to standard medical treatment (SMT) for the management of deep venous outflow obstruction and leg ulcers from the Italian Healthcare Service perspective. Materials & methods: A Markov model was developed to project co...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2020-0030
更新日期:2020-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::Clinical trial designs often fail to deliver data that jointly satisfy evolving demands of both regulatory and reimbursement authorities. We propose a new multi-tiered trial design to integrate efficacy and effectiveness, and address the evolving needs of authorities. The mixed randomized trial allocates patients firs...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2016-0034
更新日期:2016-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::The 11 big health data networks participating in the AcademyHealth Electronic Data Methods Forum represent cutting-edge efforts to harness the power of big health data for research and quality improvement. This paper is a comparative case study based on site visits conducted with a subset of these large infrastructure...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer.14.72
更新日期:2014-11-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:Reducing the fluctuation of blood pressure has recently been recognized as a potential target for improving management of hypertension to prevent cardiovascular events, particularly for strokes. Some randomized controlled trials demonstrated that amlodipine can effectively reduce blood pressure as a well-establishe...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章,多中心研究
doi:10.2217/cer-2017-0063
更新日期:2018-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::Concerted efforts are underway to improve healthcare decision-making through patient-centered outcomes research. These efforts are supported by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund, which was established within the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. This article focuses on describing national dat...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer.14.54
更新日期:2015-01-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:To understand researcher capability for and interest in patient-centered comparative effectiveness research (PC-CER), particularly related to engaging with patients/caregivers. MATERIALS & METHODS:Web-based survey of 508 health researchers recruited via professional health research organizations. RESULTS:Most res...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2016-0063
更新日期:2017-05-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:Current stroke severity scales cannot be used for archival data. We develop and validate a measure of stroke severity at hospital discharge (Stroke Administrative Severity Index [SASI]) for use in billing data. METHODS:We used the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) as the theoretical framework and identified 285 relevant In...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2017-0058
更新日期:2018-04-01 00:00:00
abstract::The intense competition that accompanied the growth of internet-based companies ushered in the era of 'big data' characterized by major innovations in processing of very large amounts of data and the application of advanced analytics including data mining and machine learning. Healthcare is on the cusp of its own era ...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer.14.2
更新日期:2014-03-01 00:00:00
abstract::Evaluation of: Olanow CW, Kieburtz K, Odin P et al. Continuous intrajejunal infusion of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease: a randomised, controlled, double-blind, double-dummy study. Lancet Neurol. 13(2), 141-149 (2014). Levodopa-induced motor complications, including mot...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 评论,杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer.14.33
更新日期:2014-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::AIMS: Stakeholder engagement is fundamental to comparative effectiveness research (CER), but lacks consistent terminology. This paper aims to define stakeholder engagement and present a conceptual model for involving stakeholders in CER. MATERIALS #ENTITYSTARTX00026; METHODS: The definitions and model were developed f...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer.12.7
更新日期:2012-03-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:To provide an overview of thresholds for incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) representing willingness-to-pay (WTP) across multiple countries and insights into exemptions pertaining to the ICER (e.g., cancer). To compare ICER thresholds to individual country's estimated ability-to-pay. MATERIALS & METHODS...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer.15.38
更新日期:2015-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::Aim: Indirect treatment comparisons are used when no direct comparison is available. Comparison networks should satisfy the transitivity assumption, that is, equal likelihood of treatment assignment for a given patient based on comparability of studies. Materials & methods: Seven criteria were evaluated across 18 rand...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2019-0064
更新日期:2019-11-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:To measure the private and social benefits of donor insemination (DI). METHODS:An empirical model investigates the general public and DI clients' willingness to pay (WTP) for DI, and the willingness of potential donors to become altruistic or paid sperm donors. RESULTS:The general public and DI clients value DI a...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章,多中心研究
doi:10.2217/cer-2016-0066
更新日期:2017-03-01 00:00:00
abstract::Aim: We assessed reporting of data on sex/gender and race/ethnicity in randomized controlled trials of interventions published in the highest-ranking anesthesiology journals from 2014 to 2017. Methods: We extracted data regarding terminology for sex/gender, proportion of participants according to the race/gender and r...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2019-0071
更新日期:2019-12-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIMS:To develop principles for planning and conducting comparative effectiveness research (CER). METHODS:Beginning with a modified existing list of health technology assessment principles, we developed a set of CER principles using literature review, engagement of multiple experts and broad stakeholder feedback. RESU...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer.12.41
更新日期:2012-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::Aim: Dedicated brain imaging is advocated by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for newly diagnosed non-small-cell cancer (NSCLC) patients beyond stage I. The current study assessed the performance characteristics of this recommendation. Methods: Through accessing the Surveillance, Epidemiology and E...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2018-0148
更新日期:2019-06-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:Many hepatitis C virus regimens are unlikely to be compared head to head. In more difficult to treat populations where there is no standard of care, trials are single arm. We describe a flexible meta-analysis platform in this setting. METHODS:Our meta-analysis is literature based. We illustrate our methodology and...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章,meta分析,评审
doi:10.2217/cer.14.69
更新日期:2015-03-01 00:00:00