Family planning in Brazil: why not tubal sterilisation during childbirth?

Abstract:

:Sterilisation is the most desired method of contraception worldwide. In 1996, the Brazilian Congress approved a family planning law that legitimised female and male sterilisation, but forbade sterilisation during childbirth. As a result of this law, procedures currently occur in a clandestine nature upon payment. Despite the law, sterilisations continue to be performed during caesarean sections. The permanence of the method is an important consideration; therefore, information about other methods must be made available. Tubal sterilisation must not be the only choice. We argue that review of this restriction will not contribute to the increase in caesarean sections but will allow for greater sterilisation choice for men and women.

journal_name

J Med Ethics

authors

Soares LC,Brollo JL

doi

10.1136/medethics-2012-101142

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2013-11-01 00:00:00

pages

710-2

issue

11

eissn

0306-6800

issn

1473-4257

pii

medethics-2012-101142

journal_volume

39

pub_type

杂志文章
  • Smoke and mirrors: unanswered questions and misleading statements obscure the truth about organ sources in China.

    abstract::This response refutes the claim made in a recent article that organs for transplantation in China will no longer be sourced from executed prisoners. We identify ongoing ethical problems due to the lack of transparent data on current numbers of transplants in China; implausible and conflicting claims about voluntary do...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2016-103533

    authors: Rogers WA,Trey T,Fiatarone Singh M,Bridgett M,Bramstedt KA,Lavee J

    更新日期:2016-08-01 00:00:00

  • Improving the evidence base in palliative medicine: a moral imperative.

    abstract:UNLABELLED:The difficulties of undertaking good quality effectiveness research in palliative medicine are well documented. Much of the ethical literature in this area focuses on the vulnerability of the palliative care population. It is clear that a wider ethical approach will need to be used to justify research in the...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2007.022632

    authors: Keeley PW

    更新日期:2008-10-01 00:00:00

  • Enhancing patient well-being: advocacy or negotiation?

    abstract::The United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visitors (UKCC) document, Exercising Accountability, states that the role of patient's advocate is an essential aspect of good professional nursing practice (1). The author examines the case for and against the nurse being the best person to act as a...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.20.3.152

    authors: Bird AW

    更新日期:1994-09-01 00:00:00

  • Balancing urgency, age and quality of life in organ allocation decisions--what would you do? A survey.

    abstract:PURPOSE:Explore public attitudes towards the trade-offs between justice and medical outcome inherent in organ allocation decisions. BACKGROUND:The US Task Force on Organ Transplantation recommended that considerations of justice, autonomy and medical outcome be part of all organ allocation decisions. Justice in this c...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2006.018291

    authors: Stahl JE,Tramontano AC,Swan JS,Cohen BJ

    更新日期:2008-02-01 00:00:00

  • What price excellence?

    abstract::A British heart surgeon argues that excellence in medicine must always be pursued even when, as in technically advanced specialties, excellence requires expensive equipment and highly trained multidisciplinary teams. He advocates that decisions on a fair and reasonable distribution of costly health services should be...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.8.3.144

    authors: English TA

    更新日期:1982-09-01 00:00:00

  • Is there an objective way to compare research risks?

    abstract::Determining whether a research risk meets or exceeds a regulatory standard of risk acceptability is difficult. Recently a framework called the systematic evaluation of research risks (SERR) has been proposed as a method of comparing research risks with predetermined standards of acceptability. SERR purports to offer a...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100194

    authors: Rossi J,Nelson RM

    更新日期:2012-07-01 00:00:00

  • Blameworthy bumping? Investigating nudge's neglected cousin.

    abstract::The realm of non-rational influence, which includes nudging, is home to many other morally interesting phenomena. In this paper, I introduce the term bumping, to discuss the category of unintentional non-rational influence. Bumping happens constantly, wherever people make choices in environments where they are affecte...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2018-105179

    authors: Miyata-Sturm A

    更新日期:2019-04-01 00:00:00

  • Tell me what's wrong with me: a discourse analysis approach to the concept of patient autonomy.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Patient autonomy has gradually replaced physician paternalism as an ethical ideal. However, in a medical context, the principle of individual autonomy has different meanings. More knowledge is needed about what is and should be an appropriate understanding of the concept of patient autonomy in clinical pract...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.24.6.394

    authors: Nessa J,Malterud K

    更新日期:1998-12-01 00:00:00

  • What sort of bioethical values are the evidence-based medicine and the GRADE approaches willing to deal with?

    abstract::The concept of evidence-based medicine (EBM) has been invented by physicians mostly from English Canada, mostly from McMaster University, Ontario, Canada. The term EBM first appeared in the biomedical literature in 1991 in an article written by a prominent member of this group-Gordon Guyatt from McMaster University. T...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2010.039735

    authors: Watine J

    更新日期:2011-03-01 00:00:00

  • The placebo effect in psychiatry: problem or solution?

    abstract::This opinion piece aims to situate the placebo effect within the field of psychiatric treatment. To accomplish this, the placebo is explored at the centre of an often heated debate between three discrete perspectives: the clinical trial researcher, the placebo researcher and the clinician. Each occupational perspectiv...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101410

    authors: Huculak S

    更新日期:2014-06-01 00:00:00

  • High hopes and automatic escalators: a critique of some new arguments in bioethics.

    abstract::Two protechnology arguments, the "hopeful principle" and the "automatic escalator", often used in bioethics, are identified and critically analysed in this paper. It is shown that the hopeful principle is closely related to the problematic precautionary principle, and the automatic escalator argument has close affinit...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2006.016477

    authors: Holm S,Takala T

    更新日期:2007-01-01 00:00:00

  • Genes and equality.

    abstract::The way people think about equality as a value will influence how they think genetic interventions should be regulated. In this paper the author uses the taxonomy of equality put forth by Derek Parfit and applies this to the issue of genetic interventions. It is argued that telic egalitarianism is untenable and that d...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2002.002329

    authors: Farrelly C

    更新日期:2004-12-01 00:00:00

  • "Why aren't you doing what we want?" Cultivating collegiality and communication between specialist and generalist physicians and residents.

    abstract::Developing residents' communication skills has been a goal of residency training programmes since the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education codified it as a core competency. In this article, a case that features problematic communication between a generalist and specialist physician is drawn upon, and i...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2006.016162

    authors: Rentmeester CA

    更新日期:2007-05-01 00:00:00

  • Altruism, blood donation and public policy: a reply to Keown.

    abstract::This is a continuation of and a development of a debate between John Keown and me. The issue discussed is whether, in Britain, an unpaid system of blood donation promotes and is justified by its promotion of altruism. Doubt is cast on the notions that public policies can, and, if they can, that they should, be aimed a...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.25.6.532

    authors: McLachlan HV

    更新日期:1999-12-01 00:00:00

  • Medical murder in Belgium and the Netherlands.

    abstract::This article is a response to Raphael Cohen-Almagor's paper entitled 'First do no harm: intentionally shortening lives of patients without their explicit request in Belgium'. His paper deals with very important matters of life and death, however its concept usage is in part misleading. For instance, the fact that medi...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-103128

    authors: Materstvedt LJ,Magelssen M

    更新日期:2016-09-01 00:00:00

  • 'These sorts of people don't do very well': race and allocation of health care resources.

    abstract::Recent literature has highlighted issues of racial discrimination in medicine. In order to explore the sometimes subtle influence of racial determinants in decisions about resource allocation, we present the case of a 53-year-old Australian Aboriginal woman with end-stage renal failure. The epidemiology of renal failu...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.21.6.356

    authors: Lowe M,Kerridge IH,Mitchell KR

    更新日期:1995-12-01 00:00:00

  • Sexual rights puzzle: re-solved?

    abstract::My sexual rights puzzle according to which positive sexual rights are not compatible with negative sexual rights has been recently criticised in the Journal of Medical Ethics by Steven J Firth, who has put forward three objections to the puzzle. In this brief response, I analyse and reject each of these three objectio...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105642

    authors: Di Nucci E

    更新日期:2020-05-01 00:00:00

  • The challenge of crafting policy for do-it-yourself brain stimulation.

    abstract::Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a simple means of brain stimulation, possesses a trifecta of appealing features: it is relatively safe, relatively inexpensive and relatively effective. It is also relatively easy to obtain a device and the do-it-yourself (DIY) community has become galvanised by reports ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101458

    authors: Fitz NS,Reiner PB

    更新日期:2015-05-01 00:00:00

  • HIV, confidentiality and 'a delicate balance': a reply to Leone Ridsdale.

    abstract::The passing on of information to GPs by genito-urinary doctors is to be encouraged but is not always possible and ultimately the patient's wishes and confidentiality must be respected if sexually transmitted diseases and HIV infection are to be controlled. Infected health-care workers should seek counselling and medic...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.17.4.196

    authors: Adler MW

    更新日期:1991-12-01 00:00:00

  • Changing practice on confidentiality: a cause for concern. Commentary 2: Confidentially speaking.

    abstract::Elaborating on the concept of confidentiality of medical records and interdisciplinary communication discussed in earlier articles by D.J. Kenny and Derek F.H. Pheby, the author expresses concern about written communications to professional colleagues and verbal revelations to colleagues or to persons outside the ther...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.8.1.21

    authors: Green M

    更新日期:1982-03-01 00:00:00

  • Women's reproductive autonomy: medicalisation and beyond.

    abstract::Reproductive autonomy is central to women's welfare both because childbearing takes place in women's bodies and because they are generally expected to take primary responsibility for child rearing. In 2005, the factors that influence their autonomy most strongly are poverty and belief systems that devalue such autonom...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1136/jme.2004.013193

    authors: Purdy L

    更新日期:2006-05-01 00:00:00

  • Coercion and choice in parent-child live kidney donation.

    abstract::This paper explores whether donor-parents felt coerced to donate a kidney to their child. There is a paucity of UK literature on parental live kidney donors and the voluntariness of their decision-making. Data were gathered as part of a study exploring parental experiences of consenting for live donation at a UK speci...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101988

    authors: Burnell P,Hulton SA,Draper H

    更新日期:2015-04-01 00:00:00

  • When enough is enough; terminating life-sustaining treatment at the patient's request: a survey of attitudes among Swedish physicians and the general public.

    abstract:OBJECTIVES:To explore attitudes and reasoning among Swedish physicians and the general public regarding the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment at a competent patient's request. DESIGN:A vignette-based postal questionnaire including 1202 randomly selected individuals in the county of Stockholm and 1200 randomly se...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2009.034967

    authors: Lindblad A,Juth N,Fürst CJ,Lynöe N

    更新日期:2010-05-01 00:00:00

  • Psychopharmacology and memory.

    abstract::Psychotropic and other drugs can alter brain mechanisms regulating the formation, storage, and retrieval of different types of memory. These include "off label" uses of existing drugs and new drugs designed specifically to target the neural bases of memory. This paper discusses the use of beta-adrenergic antagonists t...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1136/jme.2005.012575

    authors: Glannon W

    更新日期:2006-02-01 00:00:00

  • Greek theories on eugenics.

    abstract::With the recent developments in the Human Genome Mapping Project and the new technologies that are developing from it there is a renewal of concern about eugenic applications. Francis Galton (b1822, d1911), who developed the subject of eugenics, suggested that the ancient Greeks had contributed very little to social t...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 传,历史文章,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.24.4.263

    authors: Galton DJ

    更新日期:1998-08-01 00:00:00

  • Prevention of disability on grounds of suffering.

    abstract::This paper examines one particular justification for the screening and termination of embryos/fetuses which possess genetic features known to cause disability. The particular case is that put forward in several places by John Harris. He argues that the obligation to prevent needless suffering justifies the prevention ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.27.6.380

    authors: Edwards SD

    更新日期:2001-12-01 00:00:00

  • Assessing research risks systematically: the net risks test.

    abstract::Dual-track assessment directs research ethics committees (RECs) to assess the risks of research interventions based on the unclear distinction between therapeutic and non-therapeutic interventions. The net risks test, in contrast, relies on the clinically familiar method of assessing the risks and benefits of interven...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2005.014043

    authors: Wendler D,Miller FG

    更新日期:2007-08-01 00:00:00

  • Disclosure of individual research results in clinico-genomic trials: challenges, classification and criteria for decision-making.

    abstract::While an ethical obligation to report findings of clinical research to trial participants is increasingly recognised, the academic debate is often vague about what kinds of data should be fed back and how such a process should be organised. In this article, we present a classification of different actors, processes an...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2009.034041

    authors: Kollek R,Petersen I

    更新日期:2011-05-01 00:00:00

  • The ethics of clinical trials.

    abstract::In summary, the discussion by Professors Helmchen and Müller-Oerlinghausen of the morality of clinical trials has emphasized a point that is frequently overlooked. It is an essential to consider those situations in which it might be unethical not to conduct a trial as it is to be concerned about the ways in which tria...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 临床试验,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.1.4.174

    authors: Wing JK

    更新日期:1975-12-01 00:00:00

  • Moral duties and euthanasia: why to kill is not necessarily the same as to let die.

    abstract::David Shaw's response to Hugh McLachlan's criticism of his proposed new perspective on euthanasia is ineffectual, mistaken and unfair. It is false to say that the latter does not present an argument to support his claim that there is a moral difference between killing and letting die. It is not the consequences alone ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2011.044966

    authors: McLachlan H

    更新日期:2011-12-01 00:00:00