当前位置： SCI文献检索 > Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews期刊下所有文献 > Continuous positive airway pressure versus theophylline for apnea in preterm infants.

Continuous positive airway pressure versus theophylline for apnea in preterm infants.

Abstract：

BACKGROUND:Recurrent apnea is common in preterm infants, particularly at very early gestational ages. These episodes of loss of effective breathing can lead to hypoxemia and bradycardia which may be severe enough to require resuscitation including use of positive pressure ventilation. Theophylline stimulation of breathing and continuous positive airways pressure have been used to prevent apnea and its consequences. OBJECTIVES:The main objective was to determine in preterm infants with recurrent apnea, if treatment with CPAP compared with treatment with theophylline leads to a clinically important reduction in apnea or use of mechanical ventilation, without clinically important side effects. SEARCH STRATEGY:The standard search strategy of the Neonatal Review Group was used. This includes searches of the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, previous reviews including cross references, abstracts, conferences, symposia proceedings, expert informants and journal hand searching mainly in the English language. SELECTION CRITERIA:All trials using random or quasi-random allocation to CPAP or theophylline in preterm infants with clinical recurrent apnea/bradycardia were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:Data were extracted using standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration and its Neonatal Review Group, with separate evaluation of trial quality and data extraction by each author and synthesis of data using relative risk. MAIN RESULTS:The use of mask CPAP is associated with a higher treatment failure rate as measured by less than a 50% reduction in apnea or use of the alternative treatment [RR 2.89 (95% CI 1.12,7.47); RD 0.42 (95% CI 0. 11, 0.74)]. For every 2.4 infants (95% CI 1.4, 9.5) treated with mask CPAP rather than theophylline, there results one treatment failure. In the mask CPAP group there is more use of IPPV [RR 3.09 (1.42,6.70; RD 0.58 (95% CI 0.30, 0.86). For every 1.7 infants (95% CI 1.2, 3.3) treated with mask CPAP rather than theophylline, one infant is intubated for IPPV. In the mask CPAP group, there are trends towards more deaths in the first year, and in death or major disability in survivors at follow up, which do not reach significance. There are no differences in rates of necrotizing enterocolitis or major disability in survivors at follow up. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS:Theophylline is more effective than mask CPAP for preterm infants with apnea. Since CPAP is no longer administered by mask, the results of this review have limited importance for current clinical practice. Further evaluation of the benefits and harms of CPAP vs theophylline for preterm infants with apnea requires further trials in which CPAP is administered by current methods.

journal_name

Cochrane Database Syst Rev

journal_title

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews

authors

Henderson-Smart DJ,Subramanian P,Davis PG

doi

10.1002/14651858.CD001072

keywords:

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2000-01-01 00:00:00

pages

CD001072

issue

issn

1469-493X

pii

CD001072

pub_type

杂志文章,评审

在线工具

Continuous positive airway pressure versus theophylline for apnea in preterm infants.